live chess chat rom - Chess Forums - Page 3

ilikeflags

Jun 17, 2009

0

#41

i'm not opposed to your idea. but it's not what i'm talking about here. there has been some discussion about if the chat room slows the chess server down... if it actually does--which i have no idea, then i have no problem getting rid of it completely. if it doesn't--which i have no idea, it is also worth talking about how to improve it. does it need improvement? that's for each to decide. i believe it does. i'm not sure what you're accusing me of.

if 3% of the comments are racist or sexist or rude, the i see no problem removing the chat alltogether. i'm probaly in the minority about that--which is fine with me.

drivel is drivel and yes, i believe it should be eliminated. AWARDCHESS is a prime example. i think he should be 100% banned from posting in threads. i also am 100% behind the idea that non-paying members should have limited posting rights in the forums and should have no ability to start threads. however, in this thread i initially was only talking about the live chess chat room.

Kupov

Jun 17, 2009

0

#42

ilikeflags wrote:

i'm not opposed to your idea. but it's not what i'm talking about here. there has been some discussion about if the chat room slows the chess server down... if it actually does--which i have no idea, then i have no problem getting rid of it completely. if it doesn't--which i have no idea, it is also worth talking about how to improve it. does it need improvement? that's for each to decide. i believe it does. i'm not sure what you're accusing me of.

if 3% of the comments are racist or sexist or rude, the i see no problem removing the chat alltogether. i'm probaly in the minority about that--which is fine with me.

drivel is drivel and yes, i believe it should be eliminated. AWARDCHESS is a prime example. i think he should be 100% banned from posting in threads. i also am 100% behind the idea that non-paying members should have limited posting rights in the forums and should have no ability to start threads. however, in this thread i initially was only talking about the live chess chat room.

Good news! It's less than 3%.

Also you're being silly, but different strokes, etc.

ilikeflags

Jun 17, 2009

0

#43

thanks for your input.. and yes, i used to love that show... 2 black oprhans and a really rich white guy with a daughter i thought was smokin' hot (even though i was just a young lad)--classic

rich34788

Jun 17, 2009

0

#44

ozzie_c_cobblepot wrote:

Maybe this can get added to the list of unsolved mysteries on chess.com. When should I resign? When should my opponent resign? Why didn't my opponent accept the rematch?

Honestly it might be easier to work on global warming.

Might be easier to reach a consensus on GW...

ilikeflags

Jun 17, 2009

0

#45

i just noticed my type-o in the title... how embarrassing.

TheGrobe

Jun 17, 2009

0

#46

Speaking of: typo is a mistake at the keyboard -- type-o is category of blood.

Kupov

Jun 17, 2009

0

#47

heh...

ilikeflags

Jun 17, 2009

0

#48

i was aiming for irony... did it take?

TheGrobe

Jun 17, 2009

0

#49

Blood is irony. It's the haemoglobin.

DanielleSurferGirl

Jun 18, 2009

0

#50

The chat room is the one bad thing on this site. I would like to reccomend this site to some kids I tutor, but the talk that goes on in the room is usually not suitable for kids. It has been better the last month, but it still has a long way to go before this can be considered a family chess site. Hope they keep banning the bad people.