Players with a rating under 900 shouldn't be allowed to play chess

Sort:
Idrinkyourhealth

Have you ever seen a match between a 672 and an 720? ... is like watching a wild gorilla trying to eat with fork and knife... Players rated under 900 or 800 are out of control... playing their noobish short term moves producing you pain in the eyes. My eyes are bleeeding. Somebody should take control of this situation... They are destroying chess and we cant allow this

Cheddarman1

Might as well ban them all.

EvgeniyZh

I think you're totally right

I think we need to go further and to prohibit playing chess to anyone rated less than 2200 FIDE.

Scottrf

You better not lose another blitz game then.

Idrinkyourhealth

There should be a rule

macer75
Chepesiuk wrote:

I'm not saying this isn't a great idea, but, how do you propose to enforce this? 

Easy. When a player's highest rating on chess.com drops below 900, they're banned,  and their account is automatically deleted.

Zsofia_D

This is a really stupid this guys. I mean when you first started what were you automatically 1800 or something? Come on you have to start somewhere.

Idrinkyourhealth

Ye, maybe this would be the solution to the problem

Idrinkyourhealth

You start with theoretical 1200, which is more than enough

Ubik42

I think if your online rating is under 1900 then you should be slaughtered like a lamb, with your pieces and parts being fed to the better players.

EscherehcsE
Idrinkyourhealth wrote:

Somebody should take control of this situation... They are destroying chess and we cant allow this

Houdini and Stockfish are saying the same of all humans...

Idrinkyourhealth

I mean in general - there should be a rule that requires a 900+ rating to play chess, we would all get benefited of it and the game would gain a minimal prestige ...thats what i think

Zsofia_D

Just because they have a rating of under 900 does not mean they are horrible at chess. I know someone who is rated 700 something and they are under rated they can sometimes beat me.

Scottrf
Idrinkyourhealth wrote:

I mean in general - there should be a rule that requires a 900+ rating to play chess, we would all get benefited of it and the game would gain a minimal prestige ...thats what i think

Want a blitz game? If you lose, you must quit chess.

spawkle529

You guys are just being rude. Everyone starts somewhere. I mean live chess isnt accurate. Your online rating could be 1200 and in real life ur USCF rating could be 700.

Zsofia_D

Idrinkyourhealth wrote:

I mean in general - there should be a rule that requires a 900+ rating to play chess, we would all get benefited of it and the game would gain a minimal prestige ...thats what i think

How would we benefit?

Zsofia_D

Spawkle529-thank you. That is exactly what I am trying to say.

Martin_Stahl
Idrinkyourhealth wrote:

Have you ever seen a match between a 672 and an 720? ... is like watching a wild gorilla trying to eat with fork and knife... Players rated under 900 or 800 are out of control... playing their noobish short term moves producing you pain in the eyes. My eyes are bleeeding. Somebody should take control of this situation... They are destroying chess and we cant allow this

I'm sorry you are forced to watch the games of players rated U900. Is that a new basic member requirement, along with looking at advertisments?

Tongue Out

spawkle529

No problem Zsofia_D and Martin is right. Your not forced to watch people under 900. Or is that a new requirement? If it is i will check.

HessianWarrior
Idrinkyourhealth wrote:

Have you ever seen a match between a 672 and an 720? ... is like watching a wild gorilla trying to eat with fork and knife... Players rated under 900 or 800 are out of control... playing their noobish short term moves producing you pain in the eyes. My eyes are bleeeding. Somebody should take control of this situation... They are destroying chess and we cant allow this

Calling you a Clown would be a complement, so I won't say anything right now.