Schooled Another High Ranked Player

a 1685 is not a high rated player and the game is probably bullet or blitz so :/. A 1600+ uscf is different

Yes they are high ranked compared to someone with my rating. He is rated 300+ points higher than me. So me beating someone rated 300+ points higher than me and doing it more than once is impressive. And no this was a 45 minute game, stop hating!

It appears that your best win was agaisnt a 1400 something, a far cry from 1685.

No my best win was against a 1700 ranked player...  live games only record rated games.

Check out my youtube channel jaylovechess. I beat quite a few 1600-1700 ranked players

40 Qxg6 is laughtable.  The guy had a chance to draw this lost a position and he just give you the victory to grab a pawn.

Beating a +300 is good but it's not that rare. I give myself a decent chance to win until +400 where generally a win is really unlikely.

I have beaten guys 400+ POINTS HIGHER THAN ME AS WELL. And I wouldn't exactly say that beating someone 300 points higher is not that rare... I believe it is on here. 8 times out of 10 the higher ranked player will win, especially if he ranked 300 points higher.... his rating is much higher for a reason not by coincidence

Solid win.  I like your youtube videos just started playing a couple months ago. 

45....Nd1+ looks good.

Way to grind it out. I wonder if your opponent played on after queen promotion to hope for a stalemate.

You missed a quick mate Qb4 on move 73. Just wanted to point that out

1700 are so easy to beat

case- closed

Not for a 1300 ranked player like me

Keep hating

You should not be so quick to pat yourself on the back.

If you look, his average opponent rating is about 300 points less than his own. Yours is about 50. So, basically, he is used to playing people weaker than yourself.

This type of player is what I call The Stalker. They set their desired opponents ratings from -300 to +5 or something so they get lower rated players. This guy, for example, has played 6,000+ games and is still stuck at 1600.

When determining the real strength of your opponent, look at these numbers too. If your opponent's avg. opponent rating is within 100 points or so of their own, then you can be sure there is a good chance their rating is solid.

Personally I set my range from -50 to +500. I get lots of these guys. I played one the other day who had a 1900+ rating and his avg. opponent was less than 1400.

bla bla bla...it's simple, nice win JFPF!

Great photo @JFunk.  Philly rocks.  Especially in round ball.

Try putting a 5 second bonus into your games.  It will help your endgame play, and you can pound those haters too.  

Yes. Sorry. I didn't mean to take anything away from him. My comments were more about the bragging about beating a supposidly higher ranked player.

It doesn't matter. He still got to nearly 1700... and you have to beat a lot of good players at some point to get to that rating.

It's funny how you're trying so hard to take discredit my victory

And if you look at the game, read batgirl's comments, you have to learn something (you=me at least). It's cool she took such an interest to find it...