Vote Chess Ratings???

Sort:

913Glorax12

Mar 9, 2014

#121

Don't be shy, speak up

Lol!

913Glorax12

Mar 9, 2014

#122

DoctorWho wrote:

And...that's my perspective for my groups. You have your perspective for yours. Take it or leave it.

Besides Glorax, I'm not fighting any battle on any hill. I'm not in a race with anyone. But those who joined are personally welcomed in and are pointed to those House Rules on first contact. They can leave if they feel they're too stringent. If I was to join another's group and wanted to stay there, I would respect their rules too. It's not a hard thing for me to operate within set boundaries. Maybe it is for you.

~DW

You will be always fighting to keep a certain number of people, because you will be losing members that you invited and they will always be a risk of leaving.

Never said you were. Good luck though rising up in the ranks with that thinking.

ludzienka

May 8, 2014

#123

fuck you 913Glorax12

ludzienka

May 8, 2014

#124

Black is NYGA

DefinitelyNotGM

May 8, 2014

#125

VC ratings are definitely not a good idea. If there are different moves promoted by different people, and there's a 51%/49% split in the voting, then those who voted on the 49% would get their rating unfairly lowered. If you are in a small group, and socking members of the other team troll voted the same move, you'd have your rating lowered. All this does is encourage an SA to force people to vote a certain move after viewing discussion.

913Glorax12

May 8, 2014

#126

ludzienka wrote:

fuck you 913Glorax12

Good day to you too!

Hope you have a good time dying!

913Glorax12

May 8, 2014

#127

DefinitelyNotGM wrote:

VC ratings are definitely not a good idea. If there are different moves promoted by different people, and there's a 51%/49% split in the voting, then those who voted on the 49% would get their rating unfairly lowered. If you are in a small group, and socking members of the other team troll voted the same move, you'd have your rating lowered. All this does is encourage an SA to force people to vote a certain move after viewing discussion.

I see your point, however if you are in a group that has that many trolls in the small group, it is best if you leave

It does, that is the one of the points, to stop people from voting before any discusssion

Irontiger

May 8, 2014

#128

ludzienka wrote:

fuck you 913Glorax12

And that insightful post, ladies and gentlemen, successfully necroed up a two-months old thread corpse.

913Glorax12

May 8, 2014

#129

I have to agree with you here

I figured everyone was done and all questions were answered and I was happy to let it die.

DefinitelyNotGM

May 10, 2014

#130

913Glorax12 wrote:

DefinitelyNotGM wrote:

It does, that is the one of the points, to stop people from voting before any discusssion

What if there's disagreement? That's why it's Vote Chess, and not Assisted-by-other-people chess. Maybe look at the percentage, time left, number of non-spammy comments, number of troll and sock voters etc. That should make it accurate, while also completely preventing voting without discussion (or even voting at all)

913Glorax12

May 10, 2014

#131

Losing some of your VC rating will not be the end of the world. While you may lose points here and there, you still will rise up and silent voters will fall since they vote whatever. All in all, it is all about if you listen to your group.