What is youre chess style ?

What about you ?

I'm a plodder.

ok. Cool.

tiki taka of chess.. possession chess which mean to keep initiatives..  express in attack and defence.. my defence do not have enough dicipline as even my pawn like to go up when i know well it cant make u-turn. well this applies when i play chess againts my level of opponent 1600 and below. i hardly castle especially againts 1400...  my defence line is high up,   usually i sacrifise 1 or 2 pawn to give space for both rook to access the rank..

if i play againts 1700 and above. it is totally opposite. most of the time, i play park the bus... this mean to build the great wall , make difficult for opponent to break the defence...bcs i know they have alot of creativity and experience, i cant afford  to give too much room, because one mistake can prove costly and will be very hard to win if material is down. so i keep everything in shape, maybe one or two material try to be cheeky and ready to counter attack. 

glad to share with you. 

Terrible

ahaha. I am sure that you are not so bad 

Ah, you never know ! 

"Below 2000, you have no style, only weaknesses."

I think coach Heisman said that, but please correct me if I'm wrong.

no, lol I do think that you are wrong. 1000+ have styles. But not below that.

It's incorrect. The problem with this line of thinking is that whether a move is correct or not is an objective measurement, whilst style is more of a subjective preference of the person.

As an example, a 1300 may be consdiering two candidate moves (call them a and b). Eventually, 1300 decides move b is safer, while they're perceived as equal in all other regards. Now move a drops a queen, and move b drops a rook and a knight. Objectively both moves are mistakes, however the player still demonstrated their stylistic preference of playing move they perceive as less risky.

For the onlooker, they may only see mistakes, however a style exists, it is just not evident as none of the moves are acheiving their desired purpose.

In contrast, another 1300 who makes an equal number of mistakes may have a very different style in that they try to be as aggressive as possible.

To summarise, your style in practically anything is dictated by your personality and is independent of chess skill, although a lack of chess skill may prevent you from clearly demonstrating what your style is, which may lead some people to claim that there is no such thing as style at such a low level.

Here's how I roll sucka'!

The most stylish blunderer in town, baby.

Also reminds me of this saying I heard once about chess:

The best all are the best for the same reasons. The worse are each bad in their own individual way.

Oh, well ok. But in my opinion I think that there is some chess players that have one way of playing ( With acceptions ) that they are kind of atached on to.

My style is hopelandic--it makes sense to me:)

i am most of all a pretty agressive player, if there is a good opportunity to sac a piece, most of the time i do it. But if i play against strong players like 1900 or 2000+ im a strategic player who is setting up his plans in the first 10 moves

Every chess player does have a style. It may not be good, and it may not be pretty, but it is a style.

Masters have just learned how to make their particular style effective.

Does this pay off?

I've often heard it is not good to change your way of playing based on someones rating.

I would probably suggest to play regarding his games or style. If he is agressive, then you play dynamic. ( Basicly an anti style so he cant play like him self. ) Cruel but it works.

Doggy!