what rating is considered good? is 1450 good?
Sort:
Woollysock
Dec 31, 2020
0
#21
I think 1200 is a awesome rating ! ✌️😎
Dec 31, 2020
0
#22
SSAIex wrote:
Where is the point when u can call yourself decent at chess
A rating of 800-1200 means you are a beginner.
After reaching 1200 you fall in the Novice Category.
I will consider a 1600 to be decent player as it falls in Intermediate, below it as average and above 2000 is very good.
But TBH it also depends on for how long have you been playing chess.
Dec 31, 2020
0
#23
Note: If a person has a rating of 1450 in 15+10 or 30min chess then its quite good and respectable.
Dec 31, 2020
0
#24
I think 9,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999 points is an awesome rating.
at around 1450 if u take a chess board into a bar you likely wont be beaten.
Dec 31, 2020
0
#26
1450 in puzzle rating isn't that good if you ask me. If you don't believe in that, look on my profile page.
Dec 31, 2020
0
#27
ChessBoss2011ObeyMe wrote:
1450 in puzzle rating isn't that good if you ask me. If you don't believe in that, look on my profile page.
We arent talking about puzzle ratings.
Dec 31, 2020
0
#28
Isn’t good subjective? Whatever people are saying are opinions. If you think a certain rating is decent, then it is good for you. (Mine is 1400+)
Dec 31, 2020
0
#29
prime8 wrote:
at around 1450 if u take a chess board into a bar you likely wont be beaten.
yeah
Dec 31, 2020
0
#30
If you need to know how well your rating is.... Just come to my profile and compare. If you are rated lower than me...you are a noob. If you are rated higher than me , you are a pro.
Dec 31, 2020
0
#31
prime8 wrote:
at around 1450 if u take a chess board into a bar you likely wont be beaten.
Well 1450 puzzle rating, TBH its just toooooo bad! A 1450 15+10 or 30 min player is respectable rating but IMO a 1450 in 10 min chess or 3+0 and all other non increment time controls except 30 min
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
James-Nguyen wrote:
I guess im a pro then
yes
1892 is your daily rating . . .
I'd be HAPPY with a CONSTANT 1892 . . .
rishabh11great wrote:
SSAIex wrote:
Where is the point when u can call yourself decent at chess
A rating of 800-1200 means you are a beginner.
After reaching 1200 you fall in the Novice Category.
I will consider a 1600 to be decent player as it falls in Intermediate, below it as average and above 2000 is very good.
But TBH it also depends on for how long have you been playing chess.
This is typical good chess player rubbish. When I started playing, a beginner, I had a rating of 650 at FICS and I wanted to be able to beat 900's.
So where does 650 put a person if 800 is the bottom for beginner?
Why you guys are all so crazy about some virtual points here, called rating? Will you have better life having more virtual points, will you buy something in supermarket with them or..? Try to play chess for joy. Maybe the rating will come, maybe not. Starting playing chess for points just means stopping enjoying the game and starting hunting some virtual points. You can play lottery with points instead a chess. A little bit poor, right?
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
kartikeya_tiwari wrote:
No, an inaccuracy remains an inaccuracy regardless of who is playing. Blunder and inaccuracy are two different things and have objective meanings.
Nah objective changes with respect to your strength. You make a certain mistake.... You can still recover from it. A grandmaster makes the same mistake, there are far lesser chances for him to recover.
Again, if a GM makes a move which is non recoverable then it is a blunder, not an inaccuracy. For example, an inaccuracy will be if a move takes white from 0.1 to 0.75 .... it isn't clearly winning and with good defense black can hold. A blunder would be if a move takes white from 0.1 to 1.5... it means that the move gives white some serious initiative and there is no way to neutralize it without making some concessions
