Wasn't Vishy like 2800+ rated (Hikaru too but...) and former WC... maybe cuz Vishy OTB strong for long time etc and WC
Why Is chess.com Hikaru-bot Not Rated The Highest?

I think Hikaru's current OTB is n the mid 2700’s so it would make sense. Now Vishy and Vlad would make more sense to be 2800 if the bits are supposed to be them in there peak

Well, Maybe Its because both vishy and kramnik were former world champions, while hikaru hasn't been a former champion
but maybe im wrong lol idrk

Wasn't Vishy like 2800+ rated (Hikaru too but...) and former WC... maybe cuz Vishy OTB strong for long time etc and WC
Yeah, by a little:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viswanathan_Anand peak rating as of now: 2817
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Kramnik peak rating as of now: 2817
whoa, they both have identical peak ratings? pog

Wait I remember that was like the LIVE bots time... I already got mine Man vs Machine Achievement lel

I believe that those numbers refer to their OTB rating, where Naka isn't quiiiiite as high as the other two.
Oh okay, this makes sense...not to me, but it makes sense

I believe that those numbers refer to their OTB rating, where Naka isn't quiiiiite as high as the other two.
yes hikaru couldn't even beat his own bot lmao
GM @Hikaru is one of the best chess players in the world and also one of the top "faces" of chess.com, so why is Hikaru-bot rated 2750 while Vishy-bot and Kramnik-bot rated 2800?
Were these ratings taken from when GM @Hikaru was lower rated, or is this slight drop in rating to ability just to give us all a smidge more of a chance at winning?
p.s. I haven't even attempted these bots yet, but just found it somewhat strange...