About half my games I end up playing against the opening database. My opponent clearly just chooses whatever move looks worse for me from the db. In essence, I'm playing against masters and GMs. I'm nowhere near that level. So my only option is to make moves that take us out of the database, which is to say, moves that no master or GM considered to be worthwhile. This is a miserable way to play chess, and I feel at a disadvantage either way.
Sure, I could do the same thing and pick whichever move looks worse for them, but then we are just playing through someone else's game, that neither of us actually know or understand. What's the point of that?
I get that you can't stop people from using a database, but why make it so convenient?
Daily Chess is chess.com's version of Correspondence chess and opening resources have always been allowed in that type of chess. The only things not allowed are engines, tablebases, or directly asking another player what to move.
About half my games I end up playing against the opening database. My opponent clearly just chooses whatever move looks worse for me from the db. In essence, I'm playing against masters and GMs. I'm nowhere near that level. So my only option is to make moves that take us out of the database, which is to say, moves that no master or GM considered to be worthwhile. This is a miserable way to play chess, and I feel at a disadvantage either way.
Sure, I could do the same thing and pick whichever move looks worse for them, but then we are just playing through someone else's game, that neither of us actually know or understand. What's the point of that?
I get that you can't stop people from using a database, but why make it so convenient?