Apparently, erik, you work for Google.
I, for one, welcome our new Google overlords.
I don't believe the 10,000 pages per day. I have around 1,000 pages per day, spending 2-3 hours on it, but most of them are either chess.com new comments which I just go through quickly or game pages where I take a few seconds to move and get to the next move. I don't believe Erik is playing/reading at this speed 25 hours per day
Agree. I find Chrome works much better than IE Explorer.
A tin can and string works better than IE
Agreed. Opera's good, Chrome's good. But what's the consensus here? Can I do as Erik suggested without risking my computer crashing, or losing the RAM?
My system isn't new - Intel Pentium 4, 3.2GHz CPU, 1.5GB RAM.
I mostly browse the net and e-mail - virtually no high speed gaming.
the consensus is that you can do what erik suggests but you will lose performance of your computer. If all you do is surf the web then go for it.
Honestly, I think fast websites improve performance over anything else. Chess.com could use some simple optimizations (sprites, combiners, etc) would reduce a lot of the overhead of blocking components.
I did try google chrome on my old computer, but it won't load quickly, in fact it was very slow, but it could be my computer too...
Chuck Norris is on 24 hours a day
If I correctly understand the whole "Chuck Norris" joke genre, you have violated the principles by attributing something to him that's physically possible. 25 hours would be allowed.
That would only fulfill the first requirement of the most common form of the Chuck Norris joke. You must state something that is already physically impossible, and then include a condition which would make it even more impossible.
Chuck Norris is on 25 hours a day and he still gets laid.
lol this is getting really off- topic right
Agree. I find Chrome works much better than IE Explorer.
So what?! Everything works better (faster) than IE.
I still use a 2005 copy of netscape.
Yeah, it's still better than IE