I agree. It looks like a trade. You could call it Attraction. The exchange is intended to attract Black's bishop onto c6 (otherwise the rook is lost) where it becomes the target for a fork. Black's bishop is the target and the pawn is a little bonus.
This certainly creates a "clearance" path for Qe6#, Kh8, Qxc6, winning Black's bishop...
But where's the "sacrifice"...?
Is this not just a trade?
I really don't want to get into the habit of calling tactics by names that don't define them.
So the question is, can a trade that opens up a "clearance" path leading to mate or a win of material actually be called a "Clearance Sacrifice" if no sacrifice actually occurs?
Are these categorizations sometimes loosely defined?
If not, how should this tactic be correctly defined?