I had to screenshot the proof!!
<sigh>
It's en passant. It's OK...
<sigh>
It's en passant. It's OK...
That is not cheating that is enpassant
https://www.chess.com/article/view/his-pawn-cheated-and-killed-my-pawn
https://www.chess.com/terms/en-passant
The in-game computer bot plays a move I've never seen.
Explaination 1: "it's a rule I don't know about because I'm a beginner"
Explaination 2: "The computer is cheating!1!!1"
It's everyone's fantasy to find a chess computer that cheats. Almost always, that's not the case. The only one I know of that cheated on purpose was National Lampoon's "Chess Maniac 5 Billion and One".
I've never seen anyone from San Antonio cheating - thems folks just don't.
Well, I'm not so sure about Rose...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljNKZWwOnWg
I've never seen anyone from San Antonio cheating - thems folks just don't.
ohh yes they do !...cookie hadda BF who moved to PR from there. that bas-turd cheated all the time on her (tho she did too so either that didnt count or they ended up even. not sure.)
except black can't play c5, which means that the move after is illegal too.
and btw, i wrote to FIDE on this one asking for a exception in which theyre gonna review it in their rules summit in helsinki in July 2022. in that it'd be the only place where one captures the king to finnish (haha) the game.
except black can't play c5, which means that the move after is illegal too.
highly arguable. there.
oml will you ppl stop trolling with the en passant illegal thing again? en passant was invented to that people couldn't bypass a capture by moving 2 squares.
Anyone having issues with the computer cheating? I moved my pawn up 2 spots next to his pawn and somehow he claimed my pawn??
I had to screenshot the proof!!