@rexnoble -
Based on your comments, I would suggest you start with any of the books I suggested at the top of my article (below) as "good FIRST BOOKS". For example "Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess", "Pandolfini's Ultimate Guide To Chess" would be excellent choices to begin with. In fact for those below a rating of 1400-1500, you can't go wrong with anything by Pandolfini. I recommend to focus your initial acquisitions to any of the books starting from the very beginning/top of the article down to and including the books by Jeff Coakley (whose books are excellent for every beginner-novice, and not just for kids!). All of those books are very instructive for the beginner-novice.
As far as John Nunn's "Learn Chess", it is a very good general introduction to chess for the beginner, but any of his other books are relatively advanced, more appropriate for experienced players rated at least 1500-1600 and higher.
As for more advanced books, I would begin with "Play Winning Chess" by Yasser Seirawan (all of his books are good, particularly the Winning Strategy, Tactics and Endgame books). Read my commentary on "Play Winning Chess" and consider the book recommendations/progression I have suggested from there on. Particularly the books that I have identified as "Must-Reads".
One caveat. In these forums you will invariably run across recommendations to beginners to read Jeremy Silman's "How To Reassess Your Chess". I disagree with these recommendations. This book, while "good", is advanced and appropriate primarily for players rated 1500-1600 and above. For players rated below 1200, reading it would be analogous to starting your study of mathematics with a book on calculus. There is a reason that mathematics curricula begin with arithmetic! Not every "good" book is appropriate for the beginner-novice.
Having said that, "Silman's Complete Endgame Course" is appropriate for all chess players. And in the article I also recommend to eventually work with Silman's excellent "The Amateur's Mind" - but only after sufficient preparation.
As far as Kindle vs print books. If you peruse the comments relating to Kindle chess books on Amazon, you will note the common complaint that the chess diagrams and the text referring to the diagrams are in many instances not on the same page, which means that you have to keep clicking back and forth between pages when reading the text and referring to the related diagram. Because of this it can quickly become very frustrating/annoying to read Kindle chess books. On that basis alone I would not recommend them. Also if you want to find a particular section or item to read/study, it's not very easy to do - lots of clicking around, very inefficient, compared to the ease and speed with which you can flip through the pages of a print book to locate passages of interest. Bottom line - Kindle chess books are a pain in the you-know-what to read!
Good luck!
Good Chess Books for Beginners and Beyond...
https://www.chess.com/blog/RussBell/good-chess-books-for-beginners-and-beyond
https://www.chess.com/blog/RussBell
I remember being in a chess club in elementary school, and can play a basic game all of these years. But I forgot a lot of fundamentals. For example, I forget how and when to El passant and how to castle. So for my 2021 resolution, I want to be solid 800 by end of year. Is that realistic goal, I don’t know yet. I usually reach my goals when I put my mind to it.
I have seen RussBell/good-chess-books-for-beginners-and-beyond list.
And he lists good books. But I am overwhelmed where to start even after reading that. I guess I will start and refresh with Pandolfini or Nunn. And plan to practice about 5 games daily for the next 6 months.
Buying print books is always nicer then ebooks usually.
Buying print books costs about roughly 25-50% more $ then some kindle$.
So while I am asking which books to get me back to where I should be, what I also want to know is if anyone has explored what texts are better via an ebook on Kindle vs print copy?
I would like to know the answer for beginning texts through advanced texts.
Thank you.