Good Positional Chess, Planning & Strategy Books for Beginners and Beyond...
https://www.chess.com/blog/RussBell/introduction-to-positional-chess-planning-strategy
https://www.chess.com/blog/RussBell
Good Positional Chess, Planning & Strategy Books for Beginners and Beyond...
https://www.chess.com/blog/RussBell/introduction-to-positional-chess-planning-strategy
https://www.chess.com/blog/RussBell
Opening Principles:
Tactics...tactics...tactics...
The objective of development is about improving the value of your pieces by increasing the importance of their roles. Well-developed pieces have more fire-power than undeveloped pieces and they do more in helping you gain control.
Now we will look at 5 practical things you can do to help you achieve your development objective.
They are:
Don’t help your opponent develop.
There are 2 common mistakes whereby you will simply be helping your opponent to develop:
Pre Move Checklist:
General Ideas.
1. Be sure to know basic principles (control the center, basic tactics like forks, revealed attacks, etc).
2. Learn basic endgame mating patterns; King and 2 rooks, King and 1 rook, King and 2 bishops, etc. Learn to avoid tripping into a stalemate in the endgame.
3. Learn 1 opening for white, and for black learn 1 opening in response to 1.e4 and one for 1.d4.
Youtube is a great resource. Check out Levy's videos on his channel Gothamchess.
#1
"Is it too early to be thinking of strategy, and should I just focus on tactics?"
Yes, chess is 99% tactics and at your level even more.
Always look for tactics, tactics for you, but even more tactics for your opponent.
Always check your intended move is no blunder before you play it.
As long as you lose pieces and pawns to tactics all strategy is useless.
I have a very beginner question: what is the difference between tactics and strategy?
Tactics are the concrete variations of "I go here, he goes there, I give check, he moves his King, then I can take his Knight etc". Strategy is more about long term, general considerations - things like "do I want to try to exchange my Bishop for his Knight?", or "Which side should I castle?" or which pawn lever should I be aiming for" etc
Tarrasch and Capablanca, two of the strongest players ever, insisted that beginners are best served by starting by studying endgames. Once you understand the simplest things you will find it easier to understand more complex concepts.
Hello,
I am a beginner who is just getting into chess. I want to get better, and at the moment most of my focus is on tactics training (via puzzles etc). I don't know any opening, end game theory etc. I am interested in learning more about chess strategies, and had two questions:
Is it too early to be thinking of strategy, and should I just focus on tactics?
If the answer is no, what are some good books/references for learning strategy? I am thinking of buying "Winning chess strategies" by Seraiwan, Silman. Is this a good book for my level? Any other recommendations?
As you can see, a lot of different people and a lot of different answers to this question. Some parts I agree with, some I don't. I will offer you yet another opinion.
I've taught chess my entire life and have had good success training kids. The number 1 thing that makes you strong is getting amazing at tactics. Tactics can get you to 2000 almost on its own. But getting that good at tactics just takes time and practice. It's like practicing passing the ball to get you better at football. You just need to keep doing it, but it would get very boring to only focus on that and not do anything else!
I am a firm believer in looking at strategy as soon as possible. You need to know what normal moves look like. There are so many possibilities in chess that it's nice to know how to quickly narrow that down to a few reasonable moves. Playing a rook to an open file should be second nature as soon as possible.
For this I've always used "How to Reassess your Chess" by Sillman to teach chess. Even to the youngest kids. The goal is to not want to understand too much too soon. Understanding how to use the initiative and other dynamic concepts will take a lot of experience to master and should just be skipped. But learning that you'd rather not trade your bishop for a knight or that your knight really likes an outpost is something that is not too difficult to understand and can help you find good solid moves in your own games.
Openings and endgames are in my view not the right thing to start with while learning tactics. Openings can be played using general principles lined out above (get the center, develop your pieces and castle) and the basic endgames (apart from knowing how to checkmate someone) will become important once you start reaching the endgame with only 1 pawn difference.
Tarrasch and Capablanca, two of the strongest players ever, insisted that beginners are best served by starting by studying endgames. Once you understand the simplest things you will find it easier to understand more complex concepts.
If done correctly this could be good advice, but the way it's usually put into practice it's some of the worst. I.e. learning technical endgames like king + pawn vs king and the philidor position is completely worthless to a truly new player.
Tackling endgames from a strategic perspective (large focus on piece activity and what it means for a piece to be active) and basic checkmates could be very useful, but I don't know of any books (or other material) that cover this at a beginner level.
And yeah, in general the biggest impact to your results will be developing good calculation habits (which is largely done by solving puzzles)... but as @rau4ever pointed out, this is very tedious and takes a long time. Chess should be fun too (otherwise you'll give up on it) so I also agree that learning basics in other areas is important (and plants useful seeds of knowledge even if there is little immediate impact on the results of your games).
As for what a true beginner should do (true beginner meaning you've played fewer than 100 games in your life) IMO you should start by playing 100 games at a time control around 30 minutes for each side. In the beginning it takes time getting used to how the pieces move and just looking around the board in general (as in "oops, I forgot a rook was right there and could capture me", is a common beginner thought).
So I'd start by playing, and then move on to learning the basics in each area: openings, tactics, strategy, and endgames. I'd also solve a few themed puzzles every day (for example 5 puzzles with a fork, then the next day 5 puzzles with a removing the defender theme, etc).
Tactics: short term forcing moves (e.g. fork)
Positional: short term non-forcing moves (e.g. rook on open file)
Strategy: long term non-forcing moves (e.g. openings lines to seek play on the kingside)
Although "positional" and "strategy" are often used interchangeably.
And in a real game all these mix together. No one will knowingly play a series of forcing moves that wins material but leaves them in a bad position, and no one will knowingly undertake lengthy maneuvers when there are immediate tactics to worry about.
Hello,
I am a beginner who is just getting into chess. I want to get better, and at the moment most of my focus is on tactics training (via puzzles etc). I don't know any opening, end game theory etc. I am interested in learning more about chess strategies, and had two questions:
Is it too early to be thinking of strategy, and should I just focus on tactics?
If the answer is no, what are some good books/references for learning strategy? I am thinking of buying "Winning chess strategies" by Seraiwan, Silman. Is this a good book for my level? Any other recommendations?