Maybe already asked, sorry for it but i am a bit stuck with the following dilemma. I am attacking my openment his rooks, and now i can choose between : Keeping one rook and a bishop, or offering my other rook and have 2 bishops left over. Both have 5 pawns left over, he has one knight and one bishop. I can make the choice between 1 rook and a bishop, or offering also my rooks, keeping 2 bishops. Personal my feeling says bishop and a rook, in this case. So, in this case i ask myself what is better for the end game ?
Maybe already asked, sorry for it but i am a bit stuck with the following dilemma.
I am attacking my openment his rooks, and now i can choose between :
Keeping one rook and a bishop, or offering my other rook and have 2 bishops left over.
Both have 5 pawns left over, he has one knight and one bishop.
I can make the choice between 1 rook and a bishop, or offering also my rooks, keeping 2 bishops.
Personal my feeling says bishop and a rook, in this case.
So, in this case i ask myself what is better for the end game ?
Insert the game.