mistakes vs. blunders

Sort:
snoopsie
Can somebody pls explain the difference?
IMKeto

In a nutshell....

A blunder will lose the game for you.  While a mistake you can recover from. 

gotemslippen
A Blunder is a terrible potentially game threatening mistake. A mistake is just a missed opportunity or a move that makes your position slightly less optimal
notmtwain
snoopsie wrote:
Can somebody pls explain the difference?

In the analysis, it's simply a matter of the change in computer evaluation with a blunder defined as a move which leads to a 2 point or more worsening of the evaluation. 

Other terms like inaccuracy and mistake bring about lesser declines. I don't remember the exact cutoff for those.

There is some adjustment of the definition once the game evaluation swings decisively. 

 

MarkGrubb

In computer analysis a blunder is a large decrease in the evaluation. For example if you are ahead 6 pts and then lose your knight, the evaluation will reduce to ahead 3pts and it is a blunder. You may still be winning or have a winning position. It doesn't necessarily mean a mistake that will lose you the game. To mess up a large advantage is still a blunder even if you eventually win the game.

nTzT

It's the relative cost of the error. A mistake is a smaller error. A blunder often loses the whole game or advantage. A mistake could simply mean you played a sub-optimal move. Even more subtle is an inaccuracy where you aren't getting the most out of a situation.

Swar009

Blunder= You're basically gone

Mistake= You're kinda gone but not as gone as a blunder

snoopsie
Thanks all!
IMKeto
Swar009 wrote:

Blunder= You're basically gone

Mistake= You're kinda gone but not as gone as a blunder

Not necessarily.  Lets say you have 2 moves to play.

One move is a mate in one.

One move captures the opponents queen.

If you miss the mate in one, and capture the opponents queen.  A chess engine will label that move a blunder.  So all this blunder, mistake and stuff can be misleading at times.