I hate you.
Can You Teach Me How to Move the Horsey Thing?

The Knight does NOT jump, ever.
Careful examination reveals it's true movement ...
The Knight moves One square in either a vertical or horizontal direction (along a file or rank) -
and then moves One square diagonally, away from it's original square.
I hope this clears up this nonsense about horses jumping over squares, "L" patterns or one and two step dances.

So if there are pieces on all four of the vertically and horizontally adjacent squares, the Horse can't move?
That's news to me.

The Knight is able to move through the occupied 1st rank or file square, to the 1st diagonal square away from it's original square. It does not "Jump" over those squares, but rather through them.

It just creeps stealthily past the piece occupying that square?
So "Knight" is a misnomer... they should be called "Ninjas".

This is the Knight's unique quality, the ability to move through occupied squares. As is clearly evident, it does not "Jump" over squares. This is rather an archaic notion. The Knight combines a one move rank or file move with a one square diagonal move - in a single move.

Well , "Jumping over" a piece seems rather strange, does it not? Yes, it stealthily moves through the square, as if untouched.
For the real heart wrenching story why knights move the way they do.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/the-sad-tale-of-the-pawn

Those forking knights. Nothing is worse than when your opponent wins with a forking knight, especially when he’d been forking you all night long.
there’s no better fork than what I call the golden fork. That’s when your knight forks not only both your king & queen, but a rook too, on the way out the door...
From one of my over-the-board tournament games, about 35 years ago:

It's that "Knight forks King, Queen and Rook" thing.
1. Bxe5 Qxe5 2. Qxd8+ Kxd8 3. Nxf7+ with a three-way fork.

So was his.
I came out a piece up... I had King, Rook and Knight remaining against his King and Rook.
I forgot how. Although my friend 1e41-0 did respond "Neigh." This provided a huge breakthrough in my query