Three Checks You Win

Sort:
DanielleAvocado

Anyone heard of the fun way of playing chess: Three Checks? Well it's pretty simple. All you have to do is play chess, except you want to check you opponent three times. Who ever got check three times, looses and the other person who checked you three times, wins. That is simple enough right? Here's a tip: sac all your pieces just to check your opponent. If you think this game is interesting, please post your comments and suggestions. Thank you.

DanielleAvocado

DanielleAvocado

That was a really really easy one.

LAexpress12

That was pretty easy, but good tip for games like that. (3 checks.)

post a harder one, plz

RBSC

I got three checks on an opponent in a game and the computer didn't recognize that I had just won!, what's the deal with that?

ericycsong

niceFoot in mouth

ericycsong
[COMMENT DELETED]
DanielleAvocado

Here's a harder one: 

DanielleAvocado

Now try to solve that puzzle.

Anatoly_Sergievsky

Do many games make it to the endgame? I imagine most wouldn't. Take a simple Italian opening:

RosarioVampire

so uh peachter, how does white win the second game after 3...gxh6? Looks drawn.

ericycsong
peachter wrote:

Here's a harder one: 


 there is more ways to check you know

DanielleAvocado
RosarioVampire wrote:

so uh peachter, how does white win the second game after 3...gxh6? Looks drawn.


dude, if you read the first comment, you will find out that white had just win. It's three checks.

RosarioVampire

right.

DanielleAvocado
RosarioVampire wrote:

right.


that's more like it.

DW_Batty

I like the first one of these best because white wins that game the normal chess way as well.

DanielleAvocado

Here's another three checks puzzle.

Level: 0 (very easy)   

JollyPlayer

Three checks is easy.  Now for fun, make it three checks in a row!  And for RBSC,this is just for grins. These are not actual rules.

DanielleAvocado

I have a new idea of a new way of playing three checks.

  • If you did two checks in a row, you just win.
  • If you got two checks in a row, you just lose.
  • If you did one check while blocking the other person's check, you win.
  • If your opponent did a check while blocking our check, you lose.

Isn's that cool?

Eebster
peachter wrote:

I have a new idea of a new way of playing three checks.

 

If you did two checks in a row, you just win. If you got two checks in a row, you just lose. If you did one check while blocking the other person's check, you win. If your opponent did a check while blocking our check, you lose.

Isn's that cool?


That sounds like it would lead to very, very short games.