Keep in mind that not all chess player put the same amount of time investment in the game.
Those who invest time into studying their games in depth also invest in software like ChessBase. It is far better for serious analysis that anything this site will ever have.
Yes I have chessbase with the mega database. I am not so fond of Fritz 17 but Chessbase is really good.
I use Stockfish and Komodo.
Any engine designed for 64 bit machines is adequate for 95% of the positions I need to evaluate. Even Fritz 5.32 is good enough for 80%.
And that bring me back to my post who get exactly zero reply...
Well yes one that I had to "interpret".
But what is the difference in playstyle between the engine. Every engine is strong enough to beat me, but it would be nice to know what are the difference in style.
I suppose that Leila is more positional (as alpha zero clearly do not favor material gain) but for the other engine I have no clue.
Keep in mind that not all chess player put the same amount of time investment in the game.
Those who invest time into studying their games in depth also invest in software like ChessBase. It is far better for serious analysis that anything this site will ever have.
Yes I have chessbase with the mega database. I am not so fond of Fritz 17 but Chessbase is really good.
I use Stockfish and Komodo.
Any engine designed for 64 bit machines is adequate for 95% of the positions I need to evaluate. Even Fritz 5.32 is good enough for 80%.