Mate in 50...are you for real?

I admit that I am enjoying most of the improvements of V3.  I like the ranking of moves (Excellent to What were you thinking) in the analysis.  I just wrapped up playing an unrated game.  When I ran the analysis, I couldn’t help but laugh at the message after my move 54..Be2: “INACCURACY (MATE IN 50) Missed Mate.  Checkmate after hxg4+.”   Come on, how am I supposed to find a mate in 50.  Here is the game up to move 55:

For an engine its easy. for us...not so much.

I like that the engine couldn't be bothered to show you the actual 50 moves maybe it thought after the first 20 or so moves that the last 35 were obvious....

It is an engine. It can't be bargained with, it can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity or remorse or fear.

Chess is completely solved with 7 or fewer pieces on the board.  The solutions are called the tablebases.  If an engine has the tablebases, it can instantly tell you crazy stuff like this.  I had a mate in 23 via analysis in a position outside the tablebases -- *that* surprised me quite a bit.  

On a side note, that was a really daring game with blatantly superfluous sacs all throughout by both players, white mainly.

Very strange. How can the engine say it is mate in 50? In fact after hxg4 Kxg4 it is mate in 14 according to tablebase.

SF says that it's mate in 14, the computers here are broken.

I think white likes to play dangerously.  As black, I returned the favor by making random novelty moves.

I think chess.com only listed the first couple of moves towards the mate in 50.  If I couldn't find the mate in 14 earlier, there is no way that I was going to find the mate in 50.

That is funny, you missed a mate in 50 so your move was inaccurate!!

If I'm correct when the engine ranks your moves black text means your move was excellent (and gray is good, blue inaccurate, orange mistake, red blunder), so even though the computer saw a 50-move mate and you didn't your play was still excellent!

Well, you are only 1500 rating, so 2 bishops vs lone king is just coming into your range...

And BTW i have seen a mate in 67 on the chess.com engine, but luckily my opponent let me mate him quicker.

Thank you, Vickalan, for your vote of confidence in saying that my play was excellent.  I do like the new analysis feature..eventhough it might be addressed for someone that is a bit higher than I.

Ha, don't be fooled by inflated 1450 rating. I've been (un)fortunate enough to have won some games by my opponent timing out.

Of course, you saw the 67 moves.

It is just saying that exchanging the pawns to get to the bishop endgame quicker TO MATE was better.

*was quicker* way to end the pain.

Letting the chess.com Stockfish analyze a game, my opponent lost a minor piece and it was named "mistake".   If I blow a knight, I call it a blunder.