Post Game Analysis and Review

I've only been playing chess for about 2 months now. I only play against bots - usually like Azeez (1100)  with ratings between 1000 - 1400. I feel I have a strong middle game but need a lot of work on my end game - you know, inadvertent draws and missed or sloppy  checks. I rely on the post game analysis where the computer points out critical moves in the game. This usually helps BUT sometimes the "best" move according to the computer is, at least in my mind's eye, obviously wrong. My style of play is not to fear trading queens (thanks to Nelson)  - in fact I usually NEED to do this to stay competitive when I play the occasional bot 1800+. Back to the post game analysis - I just handily beat Azeez and I was +16 when I checked and was never in a deficit - yet the computer review called several moves, including the one where I traded queens as a blunder. Yet right after we traded queens I proceed to dismantle Azeez's defense. Are these game recaps really that accurate or I am just too inexperienced to know the difference? Also the same with daily puzzles - I disagree with probably 1 out of  every 7 or 8. Any advice will be helpful...