black might have played bishop to h3, so it would remove the mid pawn of the king defense, instead the castle was weak. why did black castle to a abandoned stronghold with no pawn defense ??
The bishop exchange.. well there is some slight advantage sometime if he will endup with a king side castled pawn g6, but since g6 hasnt been played, its an exchange with no purpose i think, so better moves could should have been played instead.
if you played back, castled and wrote back to begin strategics.. then think thats each game depend on the openents next move, not about what you had in mind in the past. I make such errors too sometimes, like having in mind to do a certain opening, the oponent doesnt go for the right answer, and i stick to the opening book and so, i go in a position that isnt made for the situation. Its better to play with an openview and always play the game in front of you, not another game from a book that doesnt fit in, or past memories from when the board looked differnt. (but as i told i have such errors too)
I'm pretty new to the forums, but I've been lurking for a while. This is one of my first games in a few months. Here I am black. (I am a firm believer that white and black are two different worlds as white dictates and black responds). I've never taken any classes. I learned how to play when I was like 5 years old that was 20 years ago. I feel a bit confident in my play but I'm unsure of how my thinking pattern and playstyle could use improvements. Should I do more proper/orthodox movements?
I remember playing this one guy who agressively attacked the side I castled on. He arranged his pieces in order to move easily If I castled he would move that rook's pawn up every time and use pure pressure from his strong pieces to force a fumble. I think my style is slightly more passive, should I be more agressive?
Even though I won the game, he posed some pretty good threats and choices along the way, I think this one shows the best of where I'm at skillwise. Any advice would be great.