Where'd he go wrong?

Sort:
PaulFletcher



Couple of days ago I played this game (as white). For some reason, I like the attack but I can't help but feel that black must have been able to defend itself. Any thoughts?

TheOldReb

14 Qxd5 wins a piece due to the fork at c7.

TheOldReb

Why not 21 Qxe7  mate ? 

PaulFletcher
Reb wrote:

Why not 21 Qxe7  mate ? 


That, that is a very good question. Embarassed.

The_Brain9

Firstly, you missed an amazing fork I saw luckily:

14. Qxd5!! Qxd5 15. Nxc7+ Kd8 16. Nxd5 - And you're up a piece.

He would have had about an equal game if with moves 18-20 he would have just given up the knight and attacked your queenside pawns.

Moves 18 and 19 are not the best, but 20...Qc6?? is a downright blunder. I think 20...0-0 followed by 21...Rxa2 or 21...Qxb2 would have given him a definite shot. You might still be up a pawn materially, but that's a pretty tough game to win with all the heavy pieces (Rooks and queens) still on the board.

EDIT: I would like to say that I did not see Reb's comments until after I posted and I did not copy him.

cyarstl-mteh

I think when black played 12...Qd7 and you followed up with Nb5 it went down hill for him.

   His correct reply was    12.....0-0   =    equal because if white plays 13.Qxe7.....Rfe8 wins on the spot dou to whites week back rank.