3 minor pieces sacrifice

Sort:
Philipper

In this short game I played I sacrificed no less than 3 minor pieces!

Have a look:

12_string

Sacrifices don't mean much if you loose. Weren't you playing White?

Philipper

Woops a mistake, off course I wasn't playing White but Black. I switched the names Laughing!

EternalChess

Its common sense that he was black :D

 

Very nice! especially for a 1200 rater :D

 

Yeah sacrifises are worth it when you chase the other persons king

12_string

Yeah, I thought that was what happened, but I was trying to be a bit funny. Nice game though!

linus9113

Nice.

BearSkee

Chuck Norris would be proud of ya ! He always got his man too...

turkey_12345act

That's no biggie. I sacrifice at least three minor pieces in each game I play. It's just that it's usually unintentional . . . =D

mosqutip

Very nice sacs. Point values don't mean much when you're torturing your opponent's king.

peterkirby

Black's 15th move doesn't deserve "!!" because its main advantage was only psychological... a clearly materialistic White grabbed the pawn with his King, which was, of many poor moves, perhaps the worst judgment-wise. After Kb3 he has a little bit of breathing room and can attempt to back his King into the corner. (White's 15th move was pretty bad too, as he wastes a move that could have brought his King back to his side, and he weakened his pawn structure.) Even then, you would have already gained 3 pawns to his piece and a vastly superior position. You are definitely capable of taking on tougher opponents successfully.