Wow! Black's queen traveled from one side of the board to the other! Also - I believe the beginning of the game where you sacrificed the f2 pawn is theory, is it not? For a second there, I thought that was the end of the game haha.
Chimp 2 Champ

This is all theory. f2 sac is to lure the queen inside and try to trap it. The opponent did really terrible. I have health/medication issues that makes me gas out at the of games where I blunder big big leads. Missed-wins are such understatement. I get really depressed when this cr*p happens. However, more of this will follow, and when I turn Chimps to champs, the next case will be here.

By the way it is called "Vienna Copycat Variation". Here I played the "Bishop Opening" line that transposes into that. Judging by the time usage of the champ-2-B, he was oblivion to the theory and he played it by the ear so to say. That is why he was in such a terrible doodoo. He was lost like a fart in the wind. Suddenly I had a blackout and I made a fool out of myself and a totally winning position.



for case 2, you were probably winning the whole game, except for move 40. On move 41, white could play Rf6+ and you may have lost.




However something wonderful just happened because of the game above: "Paolo-Luigi's agent, who also is a famous actor, (not the agent... silly ) contacted me to star opposite Paolo in a new "Dumb Dumber" movie. We have to replay the scene of the game above in the film.







To crown the king of the primates you just have to play like a chimp for a few moves and suddenly you are facing a royalty. So did I ... & YES so did I! Wuhahaaaaa ... I mean Ahaaohhooho...
Yes! You will think that the process above took long long long long time. From a chimp to a champ. Well the last one could be a Bobby Fischer or Magnus.
In chess, or rather my chess, sometimes it seams that I am playing a chimp and suddenly after a few moves, or let's say idiotic blunders of mine, I turn a jumping, chumpy chimp into a chili champy champ!
This is about the evolution. So let's keep it on a scientific level not personal 1.
This is: