Here's What a Chess Game With ZERO Mistakes Looks Like...

Isn't a poor sport someone who loses and makes excuses?

You've done nothing but make plenty of excuses for your losing attitude and trollish behavior on my thread. It was easy to spot too. Your first comment questioning the strength of the computer analysis because you just couldn't stand that it said zero mistakes. You weren't genuinely interested. You were only hoping you could be justified if you went negative. 

Then when it was proven you couldn't latch onto that because it indeed was the strength stipulated, you desperately clutched for something 3 months ago in yet another feeble attempt to cover it up.

The only thing is, I saw it from the beginning. 

So, no, your excuses for losing doesn't have anything to do with why you were a poor sport this time. The bringing up 2 games from 3 months ago and just your general overall losing attitude toward me period is what makes you behaving unsportsmanlike.

You sure are proud of the only 2 wins you'll ever get against me aren't you? I hope you'll cherish them.

We can just say there are no excuses for your loser's attitude.

It's one thing to lose a couple of chess games.

It's quite the other to win a couple of chess games and then behave like a loser as a person.

You cherish those 2 victories. 

It's obvious you needed them far more than I did anyway. 

If you didn't need them, you wouldn't have made excuses for losing. You would have simply said, 'Well played' and moved on. This is generally how a 'good sport' would deal with something.

As for clutching on to something from months ago, isn't that what your doing with your constant insistance of being a 1700 rated player?

A loser's attitude is being unable to accept you lost, making excuses about why those losses occured and then continuing to tell everyone who'll listen not to be fooled by your apparent lack of form.

As I have already stated, the only two times we played, you made excuses for your losses. This is a losers attitude.

I would play you again if you would play like a champ and take it on the chin when you lose, but you won't. Fantasists like you never do.

Nobody has ever beaten a healthy learningthemoves

Oh come on, don't call other people trolls. This thread was so much fun before... I'm going to try one last thing. If you can muster up an amusing answer I'll continue.

Do you, or do you not claim the game you posted to be 'a chess game with zero mistakes'?

You are the only person who keeps mentioning a 1700 rating.

that is a lot of quoting

You had one blunder: you trusted the chess.com computer analysis. Honestly, I get tired of these low rated players who post 9 move games, and claim they play perfectly because the chess.com computer tells them they made 0 mistakes.

Guess what, I drew an FM on here, with 16 moves (compared to just 9) and only 1 inaccuracy according to chess.com, not 2 (almost 25% of the inaccuracies you had). I didn't post the game on a single forum, because I don't believe in bragging about what some computer says about my game. It was a boring game where I gained a slight advantage with white in a benoni, and black's position was difficult to play (and obviously offered little winning chances), so when I offered a draw he accepted.

Also, I don't believe that g3 is the most accurate move, and the grand prix offers little to no advantage, so that also could be considered an inaccuracy.

Finally, what is this rating you speak of elsewhere? I'm 1817 USCF, and you can look up my name and state to prove it. 

That's great man. Drawing a FM is quite an accomplishment. It wouldn't be considered "bragging" to showcase your game in the showcase forum. The showcase forum's purpose is to well, showcase.

I appreciate you comparing/contrasting your experience with/against mine. Sounds like you definitely one upped me on that one. It didn't even occur to me when I was playing to drag it out to 16 moves to be quite honest, I was just enjoying the game.

I've shown ratings at other sites here before, and while most were like, "that's a good rating, etc.", it wasn't in the spirit of "prove it buddy" but in showcasing a particularly interesting game and the rating was visible. 

Contrary to the few rotten apples who started breaking the rules and attacking me, "being mean", etc., most chess players are rather encouraging and I get along with them great. I don't think you'd have to worry that mentally stable people would think you were bragging if you post it in the appropriate forum like I've done here. 

And if someone was so deranged that they'd try to derail the focus from your game into launching some kind of personal attack which is agianst the rules anyway, then, like me, you'd know their opinion doesn't matter anyway. Besides, life's too short to waste on the critics. As long as there are creators, there will be critics to criticize them.

Heck, the world champion and super grandmasters even have their own haters for the stupidest of reasons.

I have, however found 3 ways to avoid the haters and personal attacks:

1. Say nothing

2. Do nothing

3. Be nothing

Well if you're "tired of it" then that means it should have happened at least once...and it didn't.

I never claimed I played perfectly as you tried to put those words in my mouth.

And for the little Genghis Khunt, I had already posted the ratings at the other sites where one was over 1700+ and the other over 1800+ respectively.

Also, my blitz rating high was hundreds of points higher than yours and other scores of mine were higher than yours as well.

Your big beef with me was when I pointed out your trollish and uncivil behavior on another thread where you bullied another whom you envied as well.

Same old blow hard personal accusations was your tactic there just as it was here.

Not a single person was asking about rating or anything else other than the game that was mistake-free on my part.

Then only those who were envious felt it was their duty to try and make it a mistake when in fact, there were none. They couldn't stand it.

And the reason they can't stand it is because they don't understand it.

It was quite amusing seeing the lengths haters would stoop in order to try and find a fault where none existed.

So if there was any fault at all that you saw, it was only your own you were projecting from within.

And the challenge still stands Ghenghis Khunt. Any time you think you're up to it, you send the challenge but don't be surprised when the better man wins.

Actually... in hindsight, one could concider it a mistake to have played Nb5 on move 8 instead of 6. Either way, nice mate.

What i dont understand is there so many castling even on the NO mistake game you did a castling it's waste of moves and youre king is not really in better position after castling actually more worse..

No mistake game after moving back a few times. =.=

Not criticizing. Actually like youre game just suggesting..