Well, he ignored it because ususaly he would defend the pawn because it is being attacked. But he knew that there was a line to get it back.
Lesson 9 ( Einstein vs J. Robert oppenheimer )

If you like physiques and chess, this is for you ! :)
I like female physiques more than male though.
I thought you liked young boys , playing chess like Seb.

But seriousily ! I sware that is me ! here I even have another photo album of me : http://www.chess.com/photos/view_album/SebLeb0210/me-and-the-places-that-i-went-part-2
and
http://www.chess.com/photos/view_album/SebLeb0210/me--and-the-places-that-i-went2

any 1200 player could have played better than Black! besides white didn't play well either
yeah true black played badly.

This Oppenheimer guy with all due respect to him as a physicist I must say was a patzer.
Taking part in the Manhattan Project, fathering the atomic bomb and changing the course of history is simply not good for your chess.
Little did he know that had he stayed at home and practice with Chess Mentor and Tactics Trainer he could have beaten this guy easily.
A. Albert was into motion phisics
B. Oppenheimer was a theory phisisist
C. Stop talking about things you dont know about
What this game shows is that Einstein was quite tactically aware and oppenheimer wasn't. Einstein was one of Lasker's best friends, and even introduced a biography/chess book about him. Although clearly showing tons of natural talent, he professed to not really 'getting' chess as a pursuit. What he does reveal, however, was that Lasker was an erudite man.
I'm worried that your commentary doesn't point out the most instructive and useful points. Tactis and development ecist due to positional features that you fail to pick up on. This is a potentially very instructive game.
6. O-O ... Einstein ignores the fact that one of his central pawns is being attacked. Beacause since the line that Einstein thought would happen was probably :
Could u explain this a bit more in depth please :)
I did'nt think Einstein ignored anything ?!