Well actually I achieve a winning end game should white accept the exchange. It's a long explanation by my computer analysis agrees that Nxd8 is a blunder for my opponent.
It's been a month since I've played this game. I can't recall what it was. I believe it involved pushing my kingside pawns for a queen. Don't quote me on that, I'll need to do some more research.
Here is a game in which I turn an early opening mistake into a strong and devastating kingside attack. In my opinion the key move was a Ne4! in which I threaten a winning queen fork while at the same time opening the diagonal to develop my queen should my opponent decline the exchange.
I ran this through chess.com computer analysis before submitting to be sure that I didn't blunder. According to the program my only blunder was playing Qh5+ to win my opponents queen.
If anyone has some more questions about Ne4! let me know. The exchange leads to a winning end game in which I achieve a rook on my opponents back rank, pinning down and winning his undeveloped queenside pieces.