Nice game! Too bad you lost your rook. Its a good thing you won so many pieces early on lol. I've just gotten back into the game as an adult and am finding that playing longer games is KEY. DON'T play blitz as an amateur, like you pointed out, when you are playing with longer time controls, your moves stick in your head, and you are actually thinking! If after every game you do analysis (without an engine first, then after thats fine), you end up spending an hour or more on every game, so you actually LEARN from your mistakes. I think playing blitz is only beneficial at a higher level and it can actually spoil your skill.
I did this interesting test the other week, I went on fics, played about 20-30 games of blitz and got owned, and then went on chesstempo.com where I have an account and started doing tactics to see how my pattern recognition was, and my rating dropped from around 1550 to 1430, just from those games! It took about 2 hours worth of tactics to "repair" the damage so to speak. I think you just end up getting complacent and stop thinking when blitz becomes a habit. Id recommend staying with the long time controls, and see if you improve...
Anyway, cheers! Thanks for the post!
I just finished the longest Live Chess game of my life: 20 20. That means 20 minutes per side with 20 seconds of bonus time for each move!
First the good news: I saw the correct tactic at the right time and won a queen for a rook.
Now, the bad news: I had absolutely all the time in the world, with more time on my clock than my opponent, with a winning game, and blundered my rook!
It was a brain blunder, which will no doubt require brain surgery.
I was totally comfortable with the time I had left to put the finishing touches on this one after winning the exchange, even to the point of recording the time I had left on a notepad while taking a sip of coffee, basking in the glory of it all - winning my first ever slow game - having played 22.Qa5 with 17 minutes and 40 seconds left on the clock and looking to trade down. A perfect strategy.
Then, I saw Black's bishop, and then I didn't see Black's bishop - thus playing the brilliantly stupid 23.Rd8 (???????), which was supposed to force a trade of rooks. My opponet found 23...Bxd8 (!!), was not at all pleasant.
I was able to win, although I was dissapointed that my opponent blundered with 33.Be3 (??), losing a bishop for nothing, thus making the endgame less of a challenge and learning experience. Interestingly enough, neither one of us were in time trouble, so it must have been the length of the game, where one can more easily lose focus? I'm not sure yet, as this is new territory.
What did I learn?
1. I like playing slower.
2. When playing slower, the moves stick longer in my head, especially the bad ones.
3. These bad moves pack far more of a painful wallup at slow speeds, and I do believe that I will remember to play 5.dxe5, 6.dxe5 and 7.dxe5. Fritz really wanted to teach me a lesson by telling me this three times!
4. I need to put a sticky on my laptop which reads: check for ALL checks, captures and threats on every move. Play Real Chess!!