My Immortal Queen Sac

Sort:
chamo2074

Yes but take the Evergreen game, wasn't the knight sacrifice a blunder? Well if it didn't happen the game wouldn't have been that popular.

Also, maybe this was miscalculated which makes it a blunder, because I'm sure there was some compensation for the queen as opponent wouldn't have threw it away

limber_up

Thanks for all the supportive comments, guys/gals!

 

I knew the smart users of Chess.com would be able to appreciate this masterpiece. 

sndeww

32. Nc6!! "Trapping the queen"

The queen can go to e6 buddy.

This looks like a bad trolling attempt ngl

chuddog

Nice funny post by the OP. So many folks are not getting the satire. In the words of the Joker, why so serious?

PolgarsDaddy

I started seeing the annotations and I was like this dude for real why is there a ! after c4 a very logical and obvious move? then I saw the a3 alpha-zero like move annotation and I was this dude can't be serious... then I saw the "queen sac" and I realized it was an attempt at being funny and I was even more disappointed.... like that happens every other game in any <1600 game....being delusional about your chess skill I get it, that in itself is kind of funny... but being delusional about being funny that's just kinda sad... but hey apparently some people have low-standards... tik tok is here to prove it so I say go for it man... put yourself out there if people think this is funny you have quite a good chance of making it! Best of luck!

aMazeMove

entertaining as to see how the opponent declined the gambit, and still won a piece; but then blundered it back via a fork

2Ke21-0
chuddog wrote:

Nice funny post by the OP. So many folks are not getting the satire. In the words of the Joker, why so serious?

Ikr; it appears that mankind's sense of humor has been vanquished during this dark time period. 

majix0418

he is really stupid to think of a blunder as a brilliant

crosszay
limber_up wrote:

 

That game is amazing 

majix0418

NO IT ISN'T HE BLUNDERED