The best chess swindle.

Sort:
LogoCzar

Please note the statistics of 2...a6

BronsteinPawn

Lol, statistics in a game sample of 1856 means nothing, I checked some games and none of the people have played what I say.

Give me some time to turn Stockfish and kill that line once in for all.

LogoCzar
BronsteinPawn wrote:

Lol, statistics in a game sample of 1856 means nothing, I checked some games and none of the people have played what I say.

Give me some time to turn Stockfish and kill that line once in for all.

You are welcome to try.

In the meantime: here are some examples

 
 
 
 
Also: Morozevich defeating a 2500+ (as black) in your Nh3 system



LogoCzar

Morozevich's 6...b4 looks interesting...

BronsteinPawn

1st game, 200 rating difference. White didnt play Nh3.

2nd game, it was blitz, on chess.com, White didnt play Nh3.

3rd game, White was ok right out of the opening.

 

Statistics dont work, and are too general in openings. The fact that a dude blundered later on in the game does not mean the line is bad

 

Also, my diagram is not flawed, more like good luck with your arrogant space taker 2...a6, be more humble and give me space on the queenside.

LogoCzar

First of all, haven't I said 8...Nc6 is better than Be7?

I admit, white is much better there (though I'm not sure about +1.57).

And I did show the improvement. 

BronsteinPawn

Stockfish says the position is equal, so that pawn sac is sound, no wonder why a chinese GM played it. It says 0.0 at depth 20, Im gonna see if I can scratch something for White.

Do you really think I would play something that was refuted? Come on dud my humbilities protect me.

LogoCzar

2...a6 was not bad, 8...Be7 was.

LogoCzar
BronsteinPawn wrote:

Stockfish says the position is equal, so that pawn sac is sound, no wonder why a chinese GM played it. It says 0.0 at depth 20, Im gonna see if I can scratch something for White.

Do you really think I would play something that was refuted? Come on dud my humbilities protect me.

Care for a rematch?

solskytz

<Logozar> Soon, really soon... :-)

 

(Both of you) doesn't 10. ef just pick up two pieces for a rook after the 9...Bxg2 idea? (I refer to the line with 8...Be7 and 9.e5. Or what did I miss?

EDIT: Of course - it doesn't work. There's a knight on h3... 

BronsteinPawn

The fact that I hang pieces does not mean my openings are unsound.

I have no problem playing with you again, I had fun last night, are we gona play now? Just make it unrated, I dont want to get back to the 1900s for an hour if I lose against you(im pretty close to 1800 land).

 

Solskytz, I think Bxh3! is nice.

LogoCzar
solskytz wrote:

<Logozar> Soon, really soon... :-)

 

(Both of you) doesn't 10. ef just pick up two pieces for a rook after the 9...Bxg2 idea? (I refer to the line with 8...Be7 and 9.e5. Or what did I miss?

Bxh3 fxe7 Qxe7. I think black is up a pawn with a good position.

LogoCzar
BronsteinPawn wrote:

The fact that I hang pieces does not mean my openings are unsound.

I have no problem playing with you again, I had fun last night, are we gona play now? Just make it unrated, I dont want to get back to the 1900s for an hour if I lose against you(im pretty close to 1800 land).

 

Solskytz, I think Bxh3! is nice.

Meet me in live :)

BronsteinPawn

LOL. TRUE.

BronsteinPawn

Logozar is so arrogant he keeps winning against me.

But dont worry guys, I will learn theory and hopefully at least get better positions in the opening.

No cheap Sozins nor Jaenisches, IM GETTING MY THEORITICAL ADVANTAGE BUD!

At least I scored better than him yesterday, 2 wins 5 loses.

MY HUMBILITY IS GROWING!

LogoCzar
MeTheBoxLuhst wrote:
logozar wrote:

(After Nc6)

0.1

Local Stockfish Depth 21/21

so... you are using stockfish? STOCKFISH IS ILLEGAL ON CHESS.COM.

 

ADMINS BAN THIS TERRORIST

:P I didn't use stockfish during the game...

LogoCzar
BronsteinPawn wrote:

Logozar is so arrogant he keeps winning against me.

But dont worry guys, I will learn theory and hopefully at least get better positions in the opening.

No cheap Sozins nor Jaenisches, IM GETTING MY THEORITICAL ADVANTAGE BUD!

At least I scored better than him yesterday, 2 wins 5 loses.

MY HUMBILITY IS GROWING!

I think you are using arrogant wrong.

Prepare what you will :)

BronsteinPawn

Now that I know what he plays I can prepare. It was just all a bait!

LogoCzar
BronsteinPawn wrote:

Now that I know what he plays I can prepare. It was just all a bait!

Are you ready to play rated then?

BronsteinPawn

Lol, you are so arrogant you want to steal my points, I need to study openings, play them in unrated with you, see if I am not hanging pieces anymore and then playing you in rated.