Lol, statistics in a game sample of 1856 means nothing, I checked some games and none of the people have played what I say.
Give me some time to turn Stockfish and kill that line once in for all.
Lol, statistics in a game sample of 1856 means nothing, I checked some games and none of the people have played what I say.
Give me some time to turn Stockfish and kill that line once in for all.
Lol, statistics in a game sample of 1856 means nothing, I checked some games and none of the people have played what I say.
Give me some time to turn Stockfish and kill that line once in for all.
You are welcome to try.
In the meantime: here are some examples
1st game, 200 rating difference. White didnt play Nh3.
2nd game, it was blitz, on chess.com, White didnt play Nh3.
3rd game, White was ok right out of the opening.
Statistics dont work, and are too general in openings. The fact that a dude blundered later on in the game does not mean the line is bad
Also, my diagram is not flawed, more like good luck with your arrogant space taker 2...a6, be more humble and give me space on the queenside.
First of all, haven't I said 8...Nc6 is better than Be7?
I admit, white is much better there (though I'm not sure about +1.57).
And I did show the improvement.
Stockfish says the position is equal, so that pawn sac is sound, no wonder why a chinese GM played it. It says 0.0 at depth 20, Im gonna see if I can scratch something for White.
Do you really think I would play something that was refuted? Come on dud my humbilities protect me.
Stockfish says the position is equal, so that pawn sac is sound, no wonder why a chinese GM played it. It says 0.0 at depth 20, Im gonna see if I can scratch something for White.
Do you really think I would play something that was refuted? Come on dud my humbilities protect me.
Care for a rematch?
<Logozar> Soon, really soon... :-)
(Both of you) doesn't 10. ef just pick up two pieces for a rook after the 9...Bxg2 idea? (I refer to the line with 8...Be7 and 9.e5. Or what did I miss?
EDIT: Of course - it doesn't work. There's a knight on h3...
The fact that I hang pieces does not mean my openings are unsound.
I have no problem playing with you again, I had fun last night, are we gona play now? Just make it unrated, I dont want to get back to the 1900s for an hour if I lose against you(im pretty close to 1800 land).
Solskytz, I think Bxh3! is nice.
<Logozar> Soon, really soon... :-)
(Both of you) doesn't 10. ef just pick up two pieces for a rook after the 9...Bxg2 idea? (I refer to the line with 8...Be7 and 9.e5. Or what did I miss?
Bxh3 fxe7 Qxe7. I think black is up a pawn with a good position.
The fact that I hang pieces does not mean my openings are unsound.
I have no problem playing with you again, I had fun last night, are we gona play now? Just make it unrated, I dont want to get back to the 1900s for an hour if I lose against you(im pretty close to 1800 land).
Solskytz, I think Bxh3! is nice.
Meet me in live :)
Logozar is so arrogant he keeps winning against me.
But dont worry guys, I will learn theory and hopefully at least get better positions in the opening.
No cheap Sozins nor Jaenisches, IM GETTING MY THEORITICAL ADVANTAGE BUD!
At least I scored better than him yesterday, 2 wins 5 loses.
MY HUMBILITY IS GROWING!
(After Nc6)
0.1
so... you are using stockfish? STOCKFISH IS ILLEGAL ON CHESS.COM.
ADMINS BAN THIS TERRORIST
:P I didn't use stockfish during the game...
Logozar is so arrogant he keeps winning against me.
But dont worry guys, I will learn theory and hopefully at least get better positions in the opening.
No cheap Sozins nor Jaenisches, IM GETTING MY THEORITICAL ADVANTAGE BUD!
At least I scored better than him yesterday, 2 wins 5 loses.
MY HUMBILITY IS GROWING!
I think you are using arrogant wrong.
Prepare what you will :)
Please note the statistics of 2...a6