it seems you are a very strong player by the way you played
and it also semmed your opponent sucked. . .
it seems you are a very strong player by the way you played
and it also semmed your opponent sucked. . .
i don't think he was that bad because he only made like 2 mistakes and the rest of his moves were forced by me
3.Bc4 is a weak move, hoping for a quick win. 3...e6 and black would be well on his way to setting up a big center. You very decisively punished a terrible opening, but if your opponent had been stronger, you would have been the one punished.
LisaV wrote:
That bishop sacrifice against quick b4/5 g4/5 defenses is very instructive to know. Thank you. Curious...any intuitions on how you saw that?
well i think i saw something like it before in legal's mate or something. I just knew that if he brought his king back to e8 after my queen check he was done for sure, and that the only other possibilities would be to expose the king.
@tonightonly- i don't i would have been "punished" if my opponent played 3...e6. I would still be ahead in development and therefore have pretty good position
In this game my opponent made a very weak opening and i punished him for it through a series of checks(a total of 9)