I'm a lower rated player than you but what I see is white attacking with pawns over reaching despite being linked in a A or V shape. The game looks like its trading pieces without any complex tactics/ strategy. What's the point of over extending yourself with pawns. Rather than backing up the pawns it appears you were willing to make even trades without thinking about your pawns structure collapsing.
White threaten to trade queens and black used that chance to go from defending to attacking the middle pawn structure. Once the pawn structure was compromised black doubled up the Rooks and kept the momentum. exD4. Kings Pawn takes D4 was a drastic change in the game, IMO.
Again I am a low rated player for what it's worth. Not saying I can do better.
"Recently, I had the exhilarating experience of playing against Magnus Carlsen's bot on Chess.com. The game began with a confident execution of the Pirc Defense, setting a strong foundation early on. However, as the game unfolded, the bot's aggressive playstyle introduced unexpected complications that tested my strategic depth and resilience. 🕵️♂️🔍
Initially navigating through familiar positions with ease, the game took a dramatic turn when the bot intensified its attacks, challenging my defensive setup and disrupting my planned maneuvers. This shift forced me to reassess my approach and adapt under pressure, highlighting the dynamic nature of chess against formidable opponents. 💡🔀
I invite fellow chess enthusiasts to join me in dissecting this encounter. Let's analyze together where the pivotal moments occurred and explore lessons learned from facing such a renowned bot. Your insights and perspectives will enrich our understanding of tactical decision-making and strategic adjustments in high-stakes games. 🤔💬
Looking forward to your thoughts and discussions! 🌟"