Spamming should be banned too ...
1. e4-b6 should be banned
Sort:
1..b6 is not dangerous for white if you know something about this opening...It will often transpose into something like a sicilian with b6 or a french defense with the bishop on b7. Anyway, it is not dangerous.
The OP has a point. I won with it yesterday via transposition from the Morra Gambit.
It's a tough nut to crack and just as good as many of the other non-big four defences to 1e4 IMO.
You should take it up yourself !
if 1.)d4 and 2.)c4 then the white is banned.
And trolling should be banned too.
LOL !! I knew this would be a BUZZ.
I love this stupid threads like "is perpetual chess a cheat?" or "is 1.e4 an insult ?". This post was my first attempt to shock the forum :-) Allons enfants de la patrie ! LOL
Go on commenting on e4 b6 ! :-)
1. e4 ... b6 !!
Black can play b6 against e4 but white can cramp black position and make him suffer. Search on youtube, I think there are videos available on onlinechesslessons.net channel.
AllanJones wrote:
LOL !! I knew this would be a BUZZ.
I love this stupid threads like "is perpetual chess a cheat?" or "is 1.e4 an insult ?". This post was my first attempt to shock the forum :-) Allons enfants de la patrie ! LOL
Go on commenting on e4 b6 ! :-)
1. e4 ... b6 !!
BTW, I did read some intersting comments, about transposition.
e4-b6 is not a dumb opening. More, it has not yet been refutated.
It's called Owen defense.
PlentyOToole wrote:
The OP has a point. I won with it yesterday via transposition from the Morra Gambit.
:-)))
Here we are ! :-)
OK, If you think you can beat me just play 1. e4
I will manage the rest. LOL
waiting for challenges (2000+ only please)
.... What should really be banned are these useless threads where one who doesn't understand the point of chess well enough are saying bs like this.
Banning a legal opening is a completely absurd idea with no real reason. Forget about it and spend your time wiser.
Pelaaja_X wrote:
.... What should really be banned are these useless threads where one who doesn't understand the point of chess well enough are saying bs like this.
Banning a legal opening is a completely absurd idea with no real reason. Forget about it and spend your time wiser.
No sense of humour in Finland ? ;-)
Ziggy_Zugzwang wrote:
It's a tough nut to crack and just as good as many of the other non-big four defences to 1e4 IMO.
You should take it up yourself !
Yes. I should :-))
csalami10 wrote:
1..b6 is not dangerous for white if you know something about this opening..[...]
Except when played against 1. e4
:-)
If its a legal opening, then just make it illegal before banning. Problem solved.
kaynight wrote:
Chess should be banned.
Yes !
tigerprowl5 wrote:
Yea, that is a terrifying opening. Take cover folks.
"win most of the time for blacks"
Does that mean if you are Caucasian you have less chess of winning as "black"?
2.d4 (invading the center)
and now, Owen's defense in it's maximum splender :
2 ... B b7 !
3... will be ...e7 ! whatever the white plays.
Good luck !
As this opening will win most of the time for blacks, I think it should be banned as a cheating attempt.
What do you think ?