1 minute bullet chess

Bullet players who premove too much and play for time are very weak bullet players. It's like shooting fish in a barrel. I used to have to play people at that low level until my rating went up sufficiently, now they don't meet my minimum rating requirements. 

Just because they premove doesn't mean they are playing to flag you.  Premoving is a HUGE part of Bullet chess.  I may premove sometimes, but I am making good moves and trying to checkmate you etc.  NOW, there ARE a LOT of jerks out there who only play to flag you.  I beat these people all the time.  I just play good moves and beat them.  I can match their speed, but they can't match my accuracy for good moves...  If you need help with bullet, message me bro, I will happily play games with you and give you tips.  I am 2352 in Bullet.  

"I am 2352 in bullet" 

whoopdedoo!

Am i supposed to be impressed? I was 2352 rated once too, then I got a good night's sleep and sobered up!

If they blunder all their pieces you can simply capture them. It doesn't take much time to do it, so you won't be that much time down and you can checkmate them later on

First reasonable post (other than mine) in this thread!

You're a 1339 player, lol. You wouldn't know THE FIRST THING about what is involved in bullet chess at the 2400 level. 

Bullet chess is EXACTLY THE SAME AS SLOW CHESS...JUST FASTER. Same rules, same board, same pieces. Those who try to turn it into a different sort of game always suck at it. 

That's what you do in hyperbullet. Giving checks is stupid if it gives you no good. You can just move the king out of the way.

That advice is working so good for you. That's why you're rated 1256, lol. If you want to be rated 2489 you will have to do things much differently. A simple mindless approach like that just won't do!

I Know you would love to believe that I'm a cheater because it would make you feel better about the fact that you can't do better than 1256. But making baseless accusations of cheating because you lack the intelligence required to get a rating over 1300, is just proof of your lack of character and integrity and will probably get you banned. Not a bad thing since you don't really belong here anyway. My games are easy enough to inspect by chess.com admin to prove their legitimacy. 

 There is no way to use stockfish to make moves for you in a 1 min game. 

Honestly if I saw a cheater in bullet I would be impressed 

It has been done. Years ago, there was a problem with auto-programs being used on chess sites (engines that could be turned on and off, and would play the moves for you).

I don't know if those are still around, but I wouldn't be surprised.

It kind of defeats the purpose of playing chess for fun, if you ask me. But some people have different goals.

Play rapid.

Geez, what is with the mean responses.  A bullet rating of 1300 is very very good.  It puts them in a high percentile.  .....Also, while that Carl guy is a jerk and probably lonely as hell, I will defend him here as cheating in bullet is almost impossible.

A bullet rating of 1300 is extremely weak. It's way below average. You would have to be pretty dense to not be able to figure out that the chess.com statistics are not accurate because they take all the low provisional ratings into the calculation to create a ridiculous statistic that has no basis in reality. It says I'm in the top 3 players out of 1000! (99.7%). Now I know I'm good, but I'm not that good. Just like my 142 IQ (Mensa qualifying IQ), I'm probably top 1-2 out of 100. Not surprising since IQ and chess ability are closely related.

Anyone who is 1300 bullet here would be in the bottom 10% of any legitimate OTB chess club.

if they win at bullet they've won at bullet. What can i say?

you seem to know an awful lot about my father.

care to explain where you got this information? Anyways I was not intending to reply to you when i made my first post here. Have a nice day.