how did 1800 rapid lose in 13 moves, impressive
100 percent accuracy in 12+ move game
Sort:
Ok_withthat wrote:
how did 1800 rapid lose in 13 moves, impressive
St this rating point, people study some lines and play these lines like nonsense without understanding opponent's move. I play a really sharp and agressive system which is pretty much forced and that is why I always get high accuracy against sicillian. But my opponent just played his usual moves and didn't notice it doesn't work with my system
Coffeechesso wrote:
Never. That's impressive! Usually really high accuracy just means your opponent played horribly and all your moves where obvious. However your opponents score being 75.3 says he wasn't! Congrats!
My opponent played all the best move except a blunder.
RKruthik wrote:
and put you mobile to charging
I will.....
RKruthik wrote:
but i got a brilliant move
Congrats tho I do not care about brilliant move after the update. A simple sac can be a brilliant move. BTW, congrats
Jan 21, 2022
0
#10
Fayez58 wrote:
Finally, I reached 100 percent accuracy. Have you ever got 100 percent accuracy in 12+ move game?
Welcome to the club friend!
Jan 21, 2022
0
#11
100% basically means: you play a long book opening, your opponent blunders, you get in to a mating position, but you can't find the mate, and your opponent is tired of you looking and not making a move so he resigns 
It happened to me once, I just played the Marshall... Chess.com says 100%, but I don't consider it a great achivement because its only book I didn't "find" any move, besides the bishop sac which was extremely obvious...
Jan 21, 2022
0
#12
HeroinSheep wrote:
100% basically means: you play a long book opening, your opponent blunders, you get in to a mating position, but you can't find the mate, and your opponent is tired of you looking and not making a move so he resigns
It happened to me once, I just played the Marshall... Chess.com says 100%, but I don't consider it a great achivement because its only book I didn't "find" any move, besides the bishop sac which was extremely obvious...
Not's not always true you can also get a 100 from theoretical moves too. Or just being awesome.
100% by theory:
Jan 21, 2022
0
#13
Wolf_Plays_Chess wrote:
100% by theory:
bro... 1st of all that's not 100% because it features a mistake on move 1... second of all that's a cheapo englund gambit. I'm a fan of this stupid opening, especially the queen sac line, but it's not accurate in any way.
My game as well as OP's is actually techinically sound stuff, that's the only way to get 100%.
Finally, I reached 100 percent accuracy. Have you ever got 100 percent accuracy in 12+ move game?