Imalittleaxleotto wrote:
It's not a real game.
how so?
500 rated (me) beats 2000 rated
Sort:
Imalittleaxleotto wrote:
I mean a 500 can't beat a 2000
its because i blundered and i took advantage of it, also I've only been playing unrated for many months now
im willing to play however i usually play on my computer with a good mouse but my mom took it away and now i have to play on a track pad.
Wow - your tactics and positional play are way out of scope for a 500. You should work your way up the rating ladder real fast 
tactixianchess wrote:
Wow - your tactics and positional play are way out of scope for a 500. You should work your way up the rating ladder real fast
i dont play rated blitz
May 8, 2022
0
#8
Their chances are never 0 according to the way ratings are formatted. Therefore, a 500 can and will beat a 2000, be it once every 1000 games or on the first try.
Being underrated helps matters as well 🙀
Challenging them to bullet to prove it? Really? I don't think that validates or discredits their accomplishment.
"The game must be fake" check the OP's archive then. You won't find it, right?
May 8, 2022
0
#9
Imalittleaxleotto wrote:
I looked to your games ninja looks like you beat everybody above 900
Mmmm
Using me as an example?
1. I'm not 2000 xD my glicko for rapid is a little higher than a stable rating...
2. I don't usually play 500s...
3. I'm bad at chess so bad as an example.
this will forever be my most cherished Game
https://www.chess.com/game/live/45541836603