Not cool
500 rating in rapid.
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.

I am playing for 3 years and now my rating goes up to 500. Before that I was on 300-400 in rapid.
Cool
so you finally got unmuted I see
if you really want to improve, then do some puzzles, make sure you don't blunder any pieces, and watch some videos to help you improve
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
But 500 is an achievement for me. Because I was on 300-400 for years. I have done these tactics and slower games but that didn't work.
I don't think you saw many players of this range (300-500) who are at this level for years. So your point of view of chess player is very narrow . And don't it as an insult.
Well thanks for suggestions.

Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
I am playing for 3 years and now my rating goes up to 500. Before that I was on 300-400 in rapid.
Cool
so you finally got unmuted I see
if you really want to improve, then do some puzzles, make sure you don't blunder any pieces, and watch some videos to help you improve
Did I ask you help??
No?
So ...
Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
Yes. It's for fun for me.

You have been playing for 3 YEARS and you have tried a grand total of 5 puzzles. Probably that is the explanation why your rating is only 500, which is beginner level. You should be doing 5 puzzles per day, not 5 in 3 years.
You have been playing for 3 YEARS and you have tried a grand total of 5 puzzles. Probably that is the explanation why your rating is only 500, which is beginner level. You should be doing 5 puzzles per day, not 5 in 3 years.
I did 1000 puzzles on chessking app, chess tempo etc. Tactics and all I have done.

Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
I played casually and got up to 1600. Now I'm actually studying.


Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
I played casually and got up to 1600. Now I'm actually studying.
Have you played at a chessclub?

Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
I played casually and got up to 1600. Now I'm actually studying.
Have you played at a chessclub?
I do now.

Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
I played casually and got up to 1600. Now I'm actually studying.
Have you played at a chessclub?
I do now.
What was your rating on this website before you started at a chessclub?

Years of playing has still not gotten you to that easily achievable beginner rating.
I don’t intend this as an insult, it’s just a fact that you are far below the skill level of the average beginner even after playing for three years.
I recommend that you do (many) more tactics, stick to slower time controls, and watch your rating skyrocket.
Also worth noting is that because a person have an account for years doesn't necessarily means he have been hard training for years. You can have an account for 3 years and put in the same time as someone spend on chess in a week,
I played casually and got up to 1600. Now I'm actually studying.
Have you played at a chessclub?
I do now.
What was your rating on this website before you started at a chessclub?
1600. I did say I started playing seriously after I hit 1600
I am playing for 3 years and now my rating goes up to 500. Before that I was on 300-400 in rapid.
Cool