Chess has a very wide range of skill. A beginner will think 1850-1900 rapid is impossibly good, and a GM will think it's impossibly bad 
It depends on your goals. If you're happy with your rating, then that's good.
An idea of Chess.Com ratings for rapid (10 minutes per player format)
Sort:
Aug 20, 2022
0
#2
Aug 20, 2022
0
#3
As someone rated 2296 in rapid a 1900 rating is not good.
OK but in all seriousness 1900 is very strong. I mean you can just check your percentile, you’re in, what? 97%?
As someone rated 1000 in rapid a 1900 rating is REALLY good.
Well i'm not trying to grind my rating so
It is all relative. Besides, technically 10|0 is still blitz, not rapid. Standard rapid is 15|10.
Aug 20, 2022
0
#7
B1ZMARK wrote:
As someone rated 2296 in rapid a 1900 rating is not good.
OK but in all seriousness 1900 is very strong. I mean you can just check your percentile, you’re in, what? 97%?
Looks like he's 99.6%... at 2000 I'm already 99.8%, wow.
Aug 20, 2022
0
#8
llama36 wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:
As someone rated 2296 in rapid a 1900 rating is not good.
OK but in all seriousness 1900 is very strong. I mean you can just check your percentile, you’re in, what? 97%?
Looks like he's 99.6%... at 2000 I'm already 99.8%, wow.
Certified rapid moment
Hello, I have been playing on Chess.Com for quite some time now, and I have a rating of 1850-1900 on the Rapid format, where each player gets 10 minutes. I was wondering if someone could give me an idea of whether it's an okay rating, and what rating is considered somewhat good. Please note that I am specifically talking for the Rapid format.