After you have a lead in development, and a safe king, then you should open lines and try to attack. This is how all openings work, yes, even if they are moving 8 pawns on the first 8 moves.
If your development lead is very big, then it's fine to sacrifice pieces just to open up their king and go for checkmate.
Don't develop your knights and bishops to squares where it's easy for the opponent to force them to retreat with a pawn move.
Don't try to win material or attack for the first few moves. Just develop and make sure you king is safe. Another way to say this is to follow opening principals.
White played a provocative, bad, but also solid opening. You were winning for most of the game, and even near the end you weren't losing or anything. So it wasn't such a bad game on your part. Just focus on opening principals (don't initiate captures like you did on move 5) and tactics.
The Ne4 with rook behind it, then sac on f2 is a common attacking pattern when your pieces are more active, so that's a good one to remember.
Hi there. I've met quite afew players who decide to move all 8 of their pawns in the opening, Without moving a piece until move 10-20!! I find these players so annoying because dispite them knowing nothing about chess-openings they actually beat alot of people with this technique. My standard aproach to this type of player is to use the tempo I have to dovelope all my pieces and get castled. But as I do, all my pieces seem to be attacked easily by their pawns and I end up finding it really hard to get through them. Eventually when I get through they just start bringing their pieces out (hardly) and they just defend against any checks by blocking. By this time I'm getting frustrated and I try trade afew pieces or make sacrifices to get at their king, but they always seem to get the better of me. What's so annoying is they seem bad at chess, but if you try some tricks on them they seem to defend it perfectly. I've looked at some of their other games and they use this plan everytime, with prehaps slightly different variations. It throws me off so much because most people don't play chess this way. I hope my explanation makes sense. Basically my question is, what's the best plan against a player who makes alot of pawn moves? Thanks in advance