Are the chesskid.com ratings deflated or are the chess.com ratings inflated

yes indeed

I'm not sure but my chesskid rating in 5+1 which is basically all I play is 1600. My chess.com rating in 3+0/5+0 is 1450 so I'm not sure how it works.

i was also asking the same question to my self i am on chess kid  i am on chess kid about 1026 and i joined there from 1 week and played about 20 games but i played only 5 min games but in chess.com i usually play rapid matches and i am about 826 and i started playing chess.com from about 2 months and i am 13 years old but i saw the highest rating in chesskid is above 4000 and the highest in chess .com is magnus carlsen about 2889 so i think the ratings in chess kid is the one which is deflated

i also noticed the in chess.com when you win a match vs one in your similar skills and win you do not increase above 20 in your rating but in chess kid you increase too much like 63 in your rating and in chess .com in your first match you start from 1200 and if you lose you would be -500 in chess kid you start from 800 and if you lose i do not know i win my first game actually but i think you might be -200 or some thing and you can easily recover it after winning 4 games so i guess chess.com have like normal ratings and chesskid is too different from chess.com 

Funny, my chesskid rating is over 1600 and my chess.com is only around 1300

My chesskid rating is 800 points higher than my chess.com rapid rating even though chesskid rating starts at 800 and chess.com’s starts at 1600

hi

yes for me too

1599