I think it is time we remove or delete this forum. It is completely damaging, and is going to show us in poor light in front of the world.
Our rating might be low because of so many issues.
- As told by Mr. Vijay as we are chasing members this is bound to happen.
- I attribute this to poor connectivity also because of which I was not online for the past 12 days.
we should not rate us only with Average ratings only. The other things like Vote chess is also there.
- One more point I want to bring to notice is that now we are chasing Team match points also, so we are starting as many matches as possible. An average player can play only around 10 - 15 matches so our strength in some matches are very poor.
One humble request these forums can be posted in TI or IM not in public forum.
1. These groups may be enjoying playing against tougher groups only as compared to IM, which may be more 'win' focused.
Your assumptions about IM are far from reality. If you see the VC elo list i produced in this forum, IM has 12 matches against the others in the list which is the highest. You dont score well by beating easier teams.
2. On the other hand in IM the gap between top and other players may be sufficiently large for teammates to 'obey' the leader.
Urvang, though is the top player, is not the leader for IM VC. Vijay, with rating around 1850 is the leader and many times Urvang's choice is overruled. And the rating gap is not big either, so one can understand another.
So if a member of chess.com community happens to look at WL results and concludes that generally speaking Indians are not very strong players, I won't fault him.
Just because WL results in chess.com site are low does not imply Indians are weak players. You obviously are fixed upon the notion that average rating indicates strength of the chess players from India! But the core of your assumption that the sample is representative itself is incorrect. That has been argued well by Urvang and me.