I have a considerably harder time with a few pieces for each side on an open board, queens being a nightmare. If, as they say, your strength drops 500 points when you play blindfold, mine must drop a hundred or two more in those kinds of end games.
I wonder how much this holds true for fluent blindfold masters?
I have a couple of questions about playing blindfold chess.
I was playing chess at my club today. At the end (01.00 after midnight, after multiple beers!!!) I was challenged by a strong player at my club. His rating is between 1900-2000 and my rating is approximately 1600. Normally this wouldn't be very fair, so he was going to play blindfolded. We both had 7 minutes on the clock. We played for a while, he got a positional lead, but when we got to the endgame (after 20 turns) he started to make inferior moves and ultimately he lost due to the fact he forgot the position of his knight. He claimed the endgame is much harder blindfolded even though there are less pieces on the board. Apparently because the lack of reference points (if that is an english expression). Is this true? It seems to me that if you manage to get through a complicated middle game, the endgame should be a piece of cake.
After that two other players (rating 2000) decided to play blindfolded against eachother, 7 minutes on the clock. This game was of such a high level that I thought they were looking (which they were not!).For one of the players I was pretty sure that he played almost as good as he would if he was looking. Does it take some kind of special talent to play blindfolded nearly as good as normal, or do all players of that level have the ability to do that?
Anyway, it was an awesome experience and I can only hope to ever achieve that level!