yes, a sacrifice is when it is quite obvious that your opponent gave away the piece, and a blunder is when you mistakenly just lose a piece due to a mistake in calculation or just not seeing the whole board
Blunder vs. Sacrifice

It is hard to tell a blunder from a sacrifice unless you see what your opponent sees.
A blunder is when you lose. A sacrifice is when you win.
When you just sac a piece your opponent doesn't know.

yes thats the point of a sacrifice your opponent doesn't know if its a genuine mistake or just a trap

Some of my dumb blunders have turned out to be clever sacrifices.
Some of my clever sacrifices have turned out to be dumb blunders.

Some of my dumb blunders have turned out to be clever sacrifices.
Some of my clever sacrifices have turned out to be dumb blunders.
i agree with that last one lol

It is hard to tell a blunder from a sacrifice unless you see what your opponent sees.
A blunder is when you lose. A sacrifice is when you win.
When you just sac a piece your opponent doesn't know.
I have never done a sacrifice, just blunders...

If you've blundered a piece, act as if it was a sacrifice. If you've sacrificed a piece act as if you've blundered it.
I wonder if I've just invented a proverb.
Some of my dumb blunders have turned out to be clever sacrifices.
Some of my clever sacrifices have turned out to be dumb blunders.
I had a memorable clever positional sacrifice (Q for R+P) that was a dumb blunder (it needed two preparatory moves to work) and ended up being a clever sacrifice (the opponent thought it was a king attack and made two defensive moves that allowed my prep moves to be made and eventually forcing him to give up Q+P for a R (final tally - two pawns won). In another game I blundered an exchange for a center pawn an pressed hard with my center pawns, eventually twice winning a piece for a center pawn (final tally giving up R+P for B+B+N).
If you've made a blunder that loses material look for the continuation that gives the best chance for turning the blunder into a viable sacrifice. That may not involve playing the technically correct "best moves" because those moves simply slow the deterioration of the position. A swindle (which looks like yet another blunder from a player who already blundered) may often be the best chance to get back into the game.

It is hard to tell a blunder from a sacrifice unless you see what your opponent sees.
A blunder is when you lose. A sacrifice is when you win.
Not really, I mean that blunders don't mean you lose, you just lose a piece and you have a bad position. A sacrifice is when you "blunder" a piece and than get a winning position.
When it's your turn and your opponent blundered/sacked you can't really be sure to take the piece or not

Here's an over-the-board tournament game in which I made a horrible blunder, that turned out to be a clever Pawn sacrifice!

wow that is a great game.
Based on a total oversight, though!
If you liked that game, try this one:
A Heroic Defense in the Sicilian Najdorf - Kids, don't try this at home! - Chess Forums - Chess.com
It is hard to tell a blunder from a sacrifice unless you see what your opponent sees.
A blunder is when you lose. A sacrifice is when you win.
Not really, I mean that blunders don't mean you lose, you just lose a piece and you have a bad position. A sacrifice is when you "blunder" a piece and than get a winning position.
When it's your turn and your opponent blundered/sacked you can't really be sure to take the piece or not
So, it is complicated to tell, but you can do it.
After Qxd6 black has to play Bb2 before playing f3 (an immediate f3 allows Qxf8#). Other than that typo oversight it is a good example.
It is hard to tell a blunder from a sacrifice unless you see what your opponent sees.