Computers passed humans in chess skills 20 years ago. Do a google search for "kasparov deep blue"
Can chess grandmasters defeat chess supercomputers?
Sort:
tommyskoge wrote:
Computers passed humans in chess skills 20 years ago. Do a google search for "kasparov deep blue"
Deep Blue versus Garry Kasparov was a pair of six-game chessmatches between world chess champion Garry Kasparov and an IBM supercomputer called Deep Blue. The first match was played in Philadelphia in 1996 and won by Kasparov. The second was played in New York City in 1997 and won by Deep Blue.
May 28, 2018
0
#4
Any grandmasters lurking here in the forum? Please answer. I'm curious. Personally, I think computers have come of age.
Top level computers would crush any chess player. Our only hope is to unplug them
IAMBBW wrote:
Srinibas_Masanta wrote:
What do you think guys - who will win if there is a match between chess GM and supercomputers??
You meant to say super engines
yes..super engines also..
i think grandmasters can win
Deep Blue vs. Kasparov
First match
- February 10, 1996: takes place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Result: Kasparov–Deep Blue (4–2)
- Record set: Kasparov won the first match.
Second match (rematch)
- May 11, 1997: held in New York City, New York
- Result: Deep Blue–Kasparov (3½–2½)
- Record set: First computer program to defeat a world champion in a match under tournament regulations.
It's almost 18 years since IBM's Deep Blue famously beat Garry Kasparov at chess, becoming the first computer to defeat a human world champion. ... Called Komodo, the software can reach an Elo rating as high as 3304 — about 450 points higher than Kasparov, or indeed any human brain currently playing chess.
Hmm... of course We( supercomputers ) will definitely take over Champions in 100 game match.
Good chance for human play correspondence chess against computer.
I think there should be match between GM & chess engines now....as the match between deep blue and Garry Kasparov is quite old. 
PowerofHope wrote:
Only if the GM is Carlsen
yup..that will be an interesting match..
Jun 5, 2018
0
#16
Naka played Komodo with pawn odds and an older version of Rybka as his assistant and lost 0-2 to the lizard.
MitSud wrote:
Naka played Komodo with pawn odds and an older version of Rybka as his assistant and lost 0-2 to the lizard.
Are you refering to Hikaru??
"... In late 2004, the humans tried their luck again with a team of Topalov, Ponomariov and Kariakin facing Fritz, Hydra (a special-purpose multiple-processor machine) and Deep Junior. The human team were by no means run-of-the-mill GMs; at the time of writing, Topalov is ranked third in the world while Ponomariov is an ex-FIDE world champion. Despite this, the machines crushed the humans by 8.5-3.5. Out of 12 games, the humans managed to win just one and, most embarrassing of all, Fritz, running on a 1.8 GHz notebook, managed to score 3.5/4. We now have the situation in which a program you can buy in the local game shop, running on a standard notebook computer, can defeat almost any player in the world. The computers' dominance was only emphasized when, in 2005, Michael Adams lost 5.5-0.5 in a match against Hydra. This event demonstrated that computers can play extremely well not only in wild, tactical struggles, but also in quiet positions. … the only way to render [man vs machine contests] interesting would be to limit the computer's data access in some way. … even this would provide the humans with only a temporary stay of execution. The inexorable advance of computer hardware would eventually overcome the imposed limitations …" - GM John Nunn (2005)
What do you think guys - who will win if there is a match between chess GM and supercomputers??