Chess.com bots can play Brilliant moves??

If the link works then you can see that 1700 rated Arthur bot played a Brilliant move. didn't chess.com explicitly state that bots cant play brilliant moves in some article?

https://www.chess.com/analysis?pgn=%5BEvent%20%22vs%20Computer%22%5D%0A%5BSite%20%22Chess.com%22%5D%0A%5BDate%20%222021.11.23%22%5D%0A%5BRound%20%22?%22%5D%0A%5BWhite%20%22NyxHyperion123%22%5D%0A%5BBlack%20%22Arthur%22%5D%0A%5BResult%20%220-1%22%5D%0A%5BTimeControl%20%22-%22%5D%0A%5BBlackElo%20%221700%22%5D%0A%5BWhiteElo%20%22865%22%5D%0A%0A1.%20e4%20d6%202.%20d4%20g6%203.%20Nf3%20Bg7%204.%20Nc3%20c6%205.%20Be3%20b5%206.%20b4%20a5%207.%20a3%20Nd7%208.%20Bd3%20axb4%0A9.%20axb4%20Rxa1%2010.%20Qxa1%20Nh6%2011.%20h3%20Bb7%2012.%20g4%20f6%2013.%20Rg1%20Nf7%2014.%20h4%20O-O%2015.%20g5%20e5%0A16.%20d5%20fxg5%2017.%20Nxg5%20Nxg5%2018.%20Bxg5%20Qb6%2019.%20Rf1%20Ra8%2020.%20Qb2%20cxd5%2021.%20exd5%20Nf6%2022.%0AQb3%20Qd4%2023.%20Bxf6%20Bxf6%2024.%20Ke2%20Qg4%2B%2025.%20Kd2%20Qf4%2B%2026.%20Ke2%20Rc8%2027.%20Nxb5%20e4%2028.%20Bc4%0ABxh4%2029.%20Qe3%20Qxe3%2B%2030.%20fxe3%20Rxc4%2031.%20Nxd6%20Bxd5%2032.%20Nxc4%20Bxc4%2B%2033.%20Kd2%20Bxf1%2034.%0AKc3%20Be7%2035.%20Kb3%20Bg5%2036.%20c4%20Bxe3%2037.%20b5%20Bc5%2038.%20Ka4%20h5%2039.%20Ka5%20h4%2040.%20Ka6%20Bxc4%0A0-1&autorun=true&tab=review&referrer=vs-computer-game-report 

I don't recall seeing that. It doesn't make any sense since players who barely know the rules post their brilliant moves here every day. 

Furthermore, even if they had said that in the past, chess.com just made substantial revisions to what gets called brilliant.

This was your game:

I think you might agree that a move like Bxd5-- which turned around your fork and left you down by two pieces-- deserved the label.

Remember, computers are programmed to make some random moves now and then. Sometimes these random moves can be brilliant too! I'd say most of the brilliant moves I ever got were just random dumb luck as well

Seems odd to me that the bots would be prevented.

Why wouldnt they?