this website is absolutely pathetic..
Chess quality
Sort:
Please make more topics. I enjoy the tears of whiners.
Aug 13, 2015
0
#5
There are very few people that are respectable in the chess world. Most of them just professionals. People on this website make chess look so low. I respect poker players more on average.
Free internet chess server has higher quality chess players. www.JoyofSatan.org
pullin wrote:
I think the chess on this website is the worst chess played in the world today.
Yet you still have low ratings...
You're right. A monkey could. Why can't you?
1600 isn't that great on longer time limits like 15-30 minute games. 3-5 minute games make you a better chess player. You can learn to think fast and make the winning moves while still low on time.
Aug 13, 2015
0
#13
My comment that I deleted was
"You could train a monkey to beat a 1600 player on this website" (in 1 minute)
I fully stand by that.
If you asked a GM for instance to beat a computer making completely random moves on the board with the threat that at anytime the CPU could activate and start playing at a 2000 (but not higher level) it could still take 20+ seconds to win, because checkmates aren't always easy.. and it's only easy if there is no threat of resistance. Again even if these were random moves being played on the board completely.. as long as there was a threat that at anytime an intelligent counter-attack could occur it's nearly impossible to consistently win in 1 minute.
That is why there is something called integrity, dignity, and respect for the opponents and the game. People who choose to manipulate the game, by playing random moves or shuffling or having the aspiration to figure out "how to win the game" rather than how to "play the game" artificially inflate their ratings.
It's laughable when commentator's like Maurice Ashley suggest chess is "infinite" when I see the same patterns and same moves on the board endless amounts of times by users, because they play brain dead moves and the same memorized patterns and forced situations. If you attempt to play creatively players simply start trying to play the clock as you can see they have know knowledgeable resistance of how to counter-attack and continuing playing a balanced game, and play completely defensively with no ambition of winning the game.. and feel enough respect for themselves running the clock with defensive moves.
It's sad. That's why I said you could train a monkey, basically to react to patterns and play to react against moves and play the clock and legal moves as fast as possible, because people on this site have destroyed the game to that level of stupidity.
That's why if I were up against a 2000+ level players I consistently have a better chance of winning than players as high as 400 ratings points "above me" because I play logically and I play with intellect.. THey play redundantly with no intellect.. and by the words of "bobby fischer" the game is dead by the way they play it.
I also routinely beat players of all ratings up to 2000 in unrated games, because there is no barriers to my level of play unlike people who played within the tunnel vision of patterns.
It also doesn't matter what time interval you play. It actually becomes increasingly frustrating how mcuh energy and effort and intellect you put into a game in such liek 5 minutes because in the last 30-45 seconds the same thing will happen as in 1 minute. Players will simply play the clock up to that point to keep time management, and then cheat you in the last 1 minute of hte gmae before you can CLOSE.
pullin wrote:
My comment that I deleted was
"You could train a monkey to beat a 1600 player on this website" (in 1 minute)
I fully stand by that.
If you asked a GM for instance to beat a computer making completely random moves on the board with the threat that at anytime the CPU could activate and start playing at a 2000 (but not higher level) it could still take 20+ seconds to win, because checkmates aren't always easy.. and it's only easy if there is no threat of resistance. Again even if these were random moves being played on the board completely.. as long as there was a threat that at anytime an intelligent counter-attack could occur it's nearly impossible to consistently win in 1 minute.
That is why there is something called integrity, dignity, and respect for the opponents and the game. People who choose to manipulate the game, by playing random moves or shuffling or having the aspiration to figure out "how to win the game" rather than how to "play the game" artificially inflate their ratings.
It's laughable when commentator's like Maurice Ashley suggest chess is "infinite" when I see the same patterns and same moves on the board endless amounts of times by users, because they play brain dead moves and the same memorized patterns and forced situations. If you attempt to play creatively players simply start trying to play the clock as you can see they have know knowledgeable resistance of how to counter-attack and continuing playing a balanced game, and play completely defensively with no ambition of winning the game.. and feel enough respect for themselves running the clock with defensive moves.
It's sad. That's why I said you could train a monkey, basically to react to patterns and play to react against moves and play the clock and legal moves as fast as possible, because people on this site have destroyed the game to that level of stupidity.
That's why if I were up against a 2000+ level players I consistently have a better chance of winning than players as high as 400 ratings points "above me" because I play logically and I play with intellect.. THey play redundantly with no intellect.. and by the words of "bobby fischer" the game is dead by the way they play it.
I also routinely beat players of all ratings up to 2000 in unrated games, because there is no barriers to my level of play unlike people who played within the tunnel vision of patterns.
It also doesn't matter what time interval you play. It actually becomes increasingly frustrating how mcuh energy and effort and intellect you put into a game in such liek 5 minutes because in the last 30-45 seconds the same thing will happen as in 1 minute. Players will simply play the clock up to that point to keep time management, and then cheat you in the last 1 minute of hte gmae before you can CLOSE.
Just in case that you delete this pile of s*** again, I quoted it.
So basically what you are saying, you claim that you can beat 2000+ rated players, while you miss a simple pawn fork in a 10|0 game?
You suffer from extreme "Dunning–Kruger effect".
Seriously, how I feel about you now:
Aug 13, 2015
0
#16
ahahahah.. referencing gangster movies??
I guess the terrorist affliated CEO Kirsan Ilyumzhinov of chess draws in the right crowd for the game.
Just curious, what do you think, or hope, to achieve with these topics?
Aug 13, 2015
0
#18
Time management is a part of chess. There are positions complex enough, even with 5 pieces on the board, to spend days analyzing. If you don't like it, play correspondence chess. (The cheaters are rare enough)
pullin wrote:
because i have more self-respect and dignity
If you had any dignity you wouldn't post such inane threads.
I think the chess on this website is the worst chess played in the world today.
I think the game has been dumbed down and disrespected to the level of completely cheap wins and low IQ