idk
chess.com or...

Any interest in the Chess Mentor? Unique to chess.com. Here's a sample; you could probably spend a month or two just on Silman's Roots of Positional Understanding.
Course | Lessons | Rating | % Done | Action |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
10 | 2120 | 0% |
or |
|
20 | 2090 | 10% |
or |
|
9 | 2089 | 0% |
or |
|
10 | 2080 | 10% |
or |
|
300 | 2067 | 93.67% |
or |
|
10 | 2060 | 0% |
or |
|
10 | 2020 | 0% |
or |
Jadonaire, I don't recall who you are but it seems we've only played 2 games here. I don't usually talk to other people because I play on my phone and can't really chat or see the chat.
Man, what are you talking about? At least I play OTB.
Don't claim that your are 2100 USCF then. I am not even shy that I never played a single tournament.
Man, what are you talking about? At least I play OTB.
Don't claim that your are 2100 USCF then. I am not even shy that I never played a single tournament.
But I was 2100 USCF at the time of the post. Check it up yourself you dolt.
Hahaha yeah right. You never been 2000.
Read it and weep: http://www.uschess.org/msa/MbrDtlMain.php?12973804
I'm currently a 2100 uscf player and I'm looking into getting a premium membership for either chess.com or chess 24.
I've notived that chess 24 videos seem to focus more on openings but they are done by well-known grandmasters (Anand, Svidler, Kasimdzhanov, van Kampen, etc.). This is important to me since I want higher rated videos that do into theoretical theory (yes, I want to be a Master).
But I've noticed that chess.com has more of a video library (they have been around longer) but it's mostly done by lesser-known grandmasters and IMs and FMs. Are these videos more focused towards the regular club player?
Which one do you think I should get?