Amazing theory, that Bobby's false claim to greatness was based on the aging of the Soviet"s best.
More so that the Russians did not, I repeat....did not, develop their players born out in the 1940's....like they should have. I'm sure they would admit to dropping the piece here (hopefully it wasn't treble-weighted....they say they chip).
And BTW, funny how my "theory" holds up that they got back on their high knight & got back to development w/ the 1950's & 1960's born players. Women too....yay !
Short-lived was Fischer's hold on the title? Surely his reluctance was not based on the young punk, Karpov, who finally ran out of puff against Kasparov, the only modern player who would have given the Fischer at his prime a run for his money.
Again, an age thing. AK was not being outthunk so much by GK. He was entering the chessworld's senior citizenship !
And BTW, I actually feel sorry for you if you are a (Dupus) Fischer Boomer. I would say, "snap outta it !", but it's probably too late.
Fischer won the world championship in 1972 because he was the world's best chess player then. The only person who could have taken the world championship from Fischer was Kasparov.
People outside the United States know and acknowledge that Fischer was the best chess player in the 70's but is certainly not the greatest player of all time, that recognition and honour belongs to Kasparov and maybe Carlsen might take of that wreath from Kasparov's neck (matter of time ). I agree with the person who posted that Chess is Russia's game. It is Russia's game. History points to that so as the present as well. The USA only won the Olympiad because they imported Caruana and So from Italy and the Netherlands otherwise without that move the 2016 Olympiad would not have made it to the states. Minus importing players it can only take a strong and vibrant chess culture to genuinely knock Russia of their perch and i guess only former soviet countries like Armeni, Ukraine among others can overtake Russia.