Does the Bongcloud deserve to be a book opening?

Bongcloud is the strongest opening that's why it is not in the books
Lol. That's probably true.

no bongcloud shoulld not be classified as book move it should be brilliant move
It can be both!

Bongcloud should be a book opening
As much as I want it to be considered "a brilliancy" that'll just wreck chess.com analysis so I'm fine with book opening

Imo it should be considered both a book opening and a blunder at the same time (if that's possible?)

Imo it should be considered both a book opening and a blunder at the same time (if that's possible?)
Hmm... well chess.com engine currently thinks it is a mistake. Obviously wrong, the bongcloud is a very complex and if a stinking piece of silicon begs to differ with the exalted ruy lopez and sicilian lines, then maybe stockfish needs to be fixed.
So I've posted several forums called "The Bongcloud Deserves to be a Book Opening!!!" but few responded. I think that this was bc it wasn't a question, and people don't know what they say, if you know what I mean.
Now I'm making this a question, and share your thoughts and opinions. Notice I am NOT saying "Is the Bongcloud a good opening?" (and I'm not saying it's bad either to bongcloud lovers..." What I am saying is the title. My opinion is yes, the Bongcloud deserves to be a book opening.
To both bump up the forum and to prove my point, I will post some openings that deserve just as much (or less) than the bongcloud deserves to be. Please be open-minded. If you disagree with me or anyone else, then make your points, and please don't be rude to others.