Yes, I agree that I very rarely offer or accept draws. I want to play chess at the end of the day, that's the main way you improve. Every agreed draw, unless it's because the position is genuinely completely drawn, is a lost opportunity to play chess.
Draws

Yes, I agree that I very rarely offer or accept draws. I want to play chess at the end of the day, that's the main way you improve. Every agreed draw, unless it's because the position is genuinely completely drawn, is a lost opportunity to play chess.
Well that's not true. Most of the time there is another game waiting to be started in place of the one ending.
bb_gum234 wrote:
SmyslovFan wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
SmyslovFan wrote:
Put another way, the side trying to win is the one who should offer the draw.
Would you agree that this guideline supercedes a rating differential of 200+?
I'd say the higher rated player is the one playing for the win unless he's close to losing. In which case the higher rated player often offers a draw.
By far, the most common mistake I see in OTB chess draw offers is that as soon as the lower rated player doesn't have a constructive move, he offers a draw. He usually doesn't even realise he's already in a lost position.
It would be better if the lower rated player didn't offer a draw unless he is absolutely certain his opponent has no winning chances.
I agree, and if only for the mental aspect I think it's important. When playing a higher rated player I coach myself that they will not accept any draws so I shouldn't bother asking (and I wont accept any either). That helps me focus on fighting every move.
Maybe this isn't for everyone, but it helps me fight for a draw (if I find myself in an equal position with slim winning chances). And vs a stronger player, they usually make you work for it. When I'm playing with a result in mind, my play usually starts slipping.
This hits the nail on the head.